Closed
Bug 1475157
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
189.44 - 274.09% damp (osx-10-10, windows10-64, windows10-64-msvc, windows7-32-msvc) regression on push 2d44bdd3fdd49f4b533faefce1eb19b680367a24 (Wed Jul 11 2018)
Categories
(DevTools :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: igoldan, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression, talos-regression)
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?changeset=2d44bdd3fdd49f4b533faefce1eb19b680367a24 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 274% damp osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 138.74 -> 519.03 200% damp windows7-32-msvc opt e10s stylo102.17 -> 306.89 198% damp windows10-64-msvc opt e10s stylo95.24 -> 283.35 189% damp windows10-64 opt e10s stylo 90.84 -> 262.92 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=14300 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running *** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! *** Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Testing → DevTools
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
:ochameau I want to mark this as WONTFIX as it's just a harness update. Were the results above expected?
Flags: needinfo?(poirot.alex)
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ionuț Goldan [:igoldan], Performance Sheriffing from comment #1) > :ochameau I want to mark this as WONTFIX as it's just a harness update. Were > the results above expected? Yes, settle subtests were having very low durations compared to all the others, thus leading to significant increase of geometric mean.
Flags: needinfo?(poirot.alex)
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•