We have a bit of disonance, in which we have a `#document-fragment` node that is shown as a `#shadow-root`(when it is a shadow root fragment) in some places, but potentially not in others. We should really use one display string for fragments that are shadow roots, everywhere in our panels: a) Always use #shadow-root b) Always use #document-fragment In case of b), we could add a note besides the display name to identify it as a shadow dom too in the mark up view (where we display the shadow root mode). Right now the markup view renders: ``` #shadow-root (<open/closed>) ``` We could have: ``` #document-fragmnet - shadow root (<open/closed>) ```

> We should really use one display string for fragments that are shadow roots, everywhere in our panels: What are the other places where we show (or are planning to show) a display string for shadow roots? As for Reps / console, it looks like we currently show ShadowRoot { } when inspecting one. > a) Always use #shadow-root > b) Always use #document-fragment I prefer (a) since it's technically distinct from a document fragment (https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#shadowroot), and it's a more helpful search term for people who might see it in the markup view and not know what it is.

We're sticking to `#shadow-root`