Closed Bug 1495547 Opened 6 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Update Debugger Frontend v91

Categories

(DevTools :: Debugger, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

(firefox64 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 64
Tracking Status
firefox64 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jlast, Assigned: jlast)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached patch 91-1.patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → jlaster
Attachment #9013412 - Flags: review?(dwalsh)
Attachment #9013412 - Flags: review?(dwalsh) → review+
Blocks: 1495727
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 64
Blocks: 1496401
No longer blocks: 1496401
Blocks: 1496585
This bug regressed performances: == Change summary for alert #16356 (as of Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:49:52 GMT) == Regressions: 24% damp custom.jsdebugger.pause.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 436.56 -> 541.02 18% damp custom.jsdebugger.stepOut.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 463.76 -> 548.07 17% damp custom.jsdebugger.open.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 872.68 -> 1,018.16 16% damp custom.jsdebugger.reload.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 838.37 -> 972.05 14% damp custom.jsdebugger.open.DAMP osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 1,665.89 -> 1,898.61 11% damp custom.jsdebugger.reload.DAMP osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 1,857.07 -> 2,067.56 11% damp custom.jsdebugger.stepIn.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 933.92 -> 1,036.66 9% damp custom.jsdebugger.stepOver.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 442.33 -> 482.08 9% damp complicated.jsdebugger.open.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 1,342.73 -> 1,463.11 9% damp custom.jsdebugger.stepOut.DAMP osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 766.69 -> 835.30 9% damp custom.jsdebugger.stepIn.DAMP osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 1,389.80 -> 1,513.84 7% damp complicated.jsdebugger.open.DAMP osx-10-10 opt e10s stylo 2,723.10 -> 2,915.47 5% damp complicated.jsdebugger.reload.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 1,768.49 -> 1,857.21 5% damp custom.jsdebugger.close.DAMP windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 63.11 -> 66.25 For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=16356
Here is a spreadhsheet where we can track commits that landed in 91 and figure out which ones caused the regression. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yEkT0lk2UVI7tsfZpNH2yo8ajZQsLs6gyW9gGOoaTDk/edit#gid=0
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: