Today's CVS trunk crashes on http://off.net/~shaver/diary/

Stack?

confirming crash using build 2002061008 on Win2k (trunk). OS -> All. Talkback ID: TB7197600Q.

nsHTMLReflowState::Init [nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 313] nsHTMLReflowState::nsHTMLReflowState [nsHTMLReflowState.cpp, line 253] nsFirstLetterFrame::Reflow [nsFirstLetterFrame.cpp, line 236] nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 570] nsBlockReflowContext::ReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 348] nsBlockFrame::ReflowFloater [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 5292] nsBlockReflowState::FlowAndPlaceFloater [nsBlockReflowState.cpp, line 879] nsBlockReflowState::AddFloater [nsBlockReflowState.cpp, line 681] nsLineLayout::ReflowFrame [nsLineLayout.cpp, line 1177] nsInlineFrame::ReflowInlineFrame [nsInlineFrame.cpp, line 717] nsInlineFrame::ReflowFrames [nsInlineFrame.cpp, line 522] nsFirstLineFrame::Reflow [nsInlineFrame.cpp, line 1066] nsLineLayout::ReflowFrame [nsLineLayout.cpp, line 1104] nsBlockFrame::ReflowInlineFrame [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3780] nsBlockFrame::DoReflowInlineFrames [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3606] nsBlockFrame::DoReflowInlineFramesAuto [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3496] nsBlockFrame::ReflowInlineFrames [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3441] nsBlockFrame::ReflowLine [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2594] nsBlockFrame::ReflowDirtyLines [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2238] nsBlockFrame::Reflow [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 947] nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 570] nsBlockReflowContext::ReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 348] nsBlockFrame::ReflowBlockFrame [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3202] nsBlockFrame::ReflowLine [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2460] nsBlockFrame::ReflowDirtyLines [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2238] nsBlockFrame::Reflow [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 947] nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 570] nsBlockReflowContext::ReflowBlock [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp, line 348] nsBlockFrame::ReflowBlockFrame [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 3202] nsBlockFrame::ReflowLine [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2460] nsBlockFrame::ReflowDirtyLines [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 2238] nsBlockFrame::Reflow [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 947] nsAbsoluteContainingBlock::ReflowAbsoluteFrame [nsAbsoluteContainingBlock.cpp, line 447] nsAbsoluteContainingBlock::IncrementalReflow [nsAbsoluteContainingBlock.cpp, line 311] nsBlockFrame::Reflow [nsBlockFrame.cpp, line 759] nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild [nsContainerFrame.cpp, line 799] CanvasFrame::Reflow [nsHTMLFrame.cpp, line 566] nsBoxToBlockAdaptor::Reflow [nsBoxToBlockAdaptor.cpp, line 886] nsBoxToBlockAdaptor::DoLayout [nsBoxToBlockAdaptor.cpp, line 627] nsBox::Layout [nsBox.cpp, line 1052] nsScrollBoxFrame::DoLayout [nsScrollBoxFrame.cpp, line 394] nsBox::Layout [nsBox.cpp, line 1052] nsContainerBox::LayoutChildAt [nsContainerBox.cpp, line 649] nsGfxScrollFrameInner::LayoutBox [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp, line 1063] nsGfxScrollFrameInner::Layout [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp, line 1222] nsGfxScrollFrame::DoLayout [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp, line 1071] nsBox::Layout [nsBox.cpp, line 1052] nsBoxFrame::Reflow [nsBoxFrame.cpp, line 1000] nsGfxScrollFrame::Reflow [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp, line 779] nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild [nsContainerFrame.cpp, line 799] ViewportFrame::Reflow [nsViewportFrame.cpp, line 577] IncrementalReflow::Dispatch [nsPresShell.cpp, line 944] PresShell::ProcessReflowCommands [nsPresShell.cpp, line 6419] ReflowEvent::HandleEvent [nsPresShell.cpp, line 6276] PL_HandleEvent [plevent.c, line 597] PL_ProcessPendingEvents [plevent.c, line 530] _md_EventReceiverProc [plevent.c, line 1078] nsAppShellService::Run [nsAppShellService.cpp, line 451] main1 [nsAppRunner.cpp, line 1472] main [nsAppRunner.cpp, line 1808] WinMain [nsAppRunner.cpp, line 1826] WinMainCRTStartup() KERNEL32.DLL + 0x17d08 (0x77e97d08)

Related: bug 148245.

Confirmed on 2002-06.10 running W98. I think we should let MS have their illegal operation for themselves. Else we might get sued for interfering with their trade. Do we want that? ;-D

Stack is identical to bug 148245. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148245 ***

Verified dupe of 148245