Closed Bug 151545 (thai-bold-italic) Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

text style "bold" and "italic" didn't applied with Thai text

Categories

(Core :: Internationalization, defect)

Sun
Solaris
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

CLOSED INVALID

People

(Reporter: arthit.suriyawongkul, Assigned: tetsuroy)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: intl)

Attachments

(3 files)

Mozilla build id 2002061222 Solaris 8 th_TH.TIS620 locale ---- <b> and <i> tags didn't changed the style of Thai text, Thai text still displayed in normal style. expected result: Thai text displayed in bold style, when between <b>..</b> Thai text displayed in italic style, when between <i>..</i>
Alias: thai bold italic
OS: SunOS → Solaris
Blocks: thai
Removing spaces from alias. Aliases should not contain spaces because they will confuse Bugzilla in bug lists (like the dependency lists).
Alias: thai bold italic → thai-bold-italic
Keywords: intl
QA Contact: ruixu → ylong
06-18 branch build/Linux RH7.2: With test case in comment #1: bold italic doesn't work, the rests works OK. With test case in comment #2: "italic" and "bold italic" don't work.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
this is just a guess... try list Thai fonts available in system # xlsfonts | grep tis on Solaris, we'll get something like this -monotype-angsa-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsab-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsai-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsaz-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-browa-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-browab-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-browai-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-browaz-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-cordia-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-cordiab-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-cordiai-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-cordiaz-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 from the list there's 3 typefaces 1) angsa 2) browa 3) cordia each typeface has 4 variants (medium-regular, bold-regular, medium-italic, bold-italic) BUT the naming convension of each variant of font is differ from fonts in other languages. for example, -monotype-school-bold-i-normal-bold italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5 -monotype-school-bold-r-normal-bold-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5 -monotype-school-regular-i-normal-italic-0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5 -monotype-school-regular-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5 we can see that, the format is -company-facename-bold?-i?-xxxxxxxxxxx but in case of Thai fonts shown above, facenames of each variant are NOT the same. in case of "angsa", there're angsa angsab angsai angsaz if these fonts follow the same format with fonts in other languages, it should be -monotype-angsa-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsa-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsa-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 -monotype-angsa-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 (no 'i' or 'b' or 'z' after "angsa") ---- does the font name is a possible cause of this bug ?
Yes, it's Solaris problem. We need to fix the font definitions in fonts.dir (fonts.scale) in Solaris side. When I changed the fonts.dir, I got the correct fonts in the examples, 16 angsa.ttf -monotype-angsa-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 angsai.ttf -monotype-angsa-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 angsab.ttf -monotype-angsa-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 angsaz.ttf -monotype-angsa-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 browa.ttf -monotype-browa-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 browai.ttf -monotype-browa-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 browab.ttf -monotype-browa-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 browaz.ttf -monotype-browa-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 cordia.ttf -monotype-cordia-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 cordiai.ttf -monotype-cordia-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 cordiab.ttf -monotype-cordia-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 cordiaz.ttf -monotype-cordia-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 lucida.ttf -bigelow-lucida-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 lucidai.ttf -bigelow-lucida-medium-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 lucidab.ttf -bigelow-lucida-bold-r-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0 lucidaz.ttf -bigelow-lucida-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-m-0-tis620.2533-0
Yokoyama-san, This is Solaris bug, I believe. Can you close this bug?
Closing as per comment #8. Arthit: please reopen if you disagree.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Verified as comment above.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
you can close this bug, it is actually the Solaris bug - as Katakai said.
done
Status: VERIFIED → CLOSED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: