Crash in mozilla::net::TLSFilterTransaction::WriteSegments
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox64 | --- | unaffected |
firefox65 | + | fixed |
firefox66 | + | fixed |
People
(Reporter: philipp, Assigned: dragana)
References
Details
(4 keywords, Whiteboard: [necko-triaged][post-cristsmash-triage])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
abillings
:
sec-approval+
|
Details |
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Is this ready for a sec-approval request? We've got about a week and a half left for this to land in time to make it into 65.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
:mayhemer should we get the sec-review without dragana? She's out for a couple more days.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9033179 [details]
Check if we reenter CreateShimError. r=mayhemer
[Security Approval Request]
How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?: The patch check whether we are reentering a function. Looking how the function is call, someone could figure out what goes wrong.
Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?: Yes
Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?: 65
If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?: Bug 1434137
Do you have backports for the affected branches?: Yes
If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?:
How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?: unlikely. The patch is small and strait forward.
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9033179 [details]
Check if we reenter CreateShimError. r=mayhemer
Sec-approval+ for trunk. We'll want a beta patch made and nominated quickly so we can get this into Beta as well in time for...betas.
dragana or mayhemer can you nominate a beta patch for uplift? If you can tonight, it could still make it into tomorrow's beta 10 build.
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/740f1995b128
This grafts cleanly as-landed. Just needs an approval request.
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9033179 [details]
Check if we reenter CreateShimError. r=mayhemer
[Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request]
Feature/Bug causing the regression: Bug 1434137
User impact if declined: crash.
Is this code covered by automated tests?: No
Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
Needs manual test from QE?: No
If yes, steps to reproduce: there are no step to reproduce.
List of other uplifts needed: None
Risk to taking this patch: Low
Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): The patch is small and strait forward.
String changes made/needed:
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9033179 [details]
Check if we reenter CreateShimError. r=mayhemer
[Triage Comment]
Fixes a sec-high crash. Approved for 65.0b11.
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
uplift |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Filed bug 1532323 for the remaining crashes.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•