Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Description • 22 years ago

tis620-2 is not defined as th (Thai) language group in charsetData.properties.
So when we bring up font preference dialog, there is no font available for
Thai language.

	Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Comment 2 • 22 years ago

Yokoyama-san,

could you please r= for the patch?

Thank you.

	Arthit Suriyawongkul
	Comment 3 • 22 years ago

just reminder,

tis-620 is for character encoding.
tis-620-x (tis-620-0, tis-620-1, tis-620-2) is for font set.

	Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Comment 4 • 22 years ago

Can anyone r= please?

	Frank Tang
	Comment 5 • 22 years ago

Comment on attachment 88282 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

r=ftang make sense.

	Simon Fraser [no longer active]
	Comment 6 • 22 years ago

Comment on attachment 88282 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

sr=sfraser

	Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Comment 7 • 22 years ago

Thanks for review and super-review.

Sorry, attachment 88282 [details] [diff] [review] contains other changes (hkscs-1) for testing purpose
by mistake, only tis620-2 line is valid.

Checked into Trunk.

	Yuying Long
	Comment 9 • 22 years ago

Katakai-san:
Do I need some thai font available in my linux system in order to verify this?
if so, could you tell me how/where can I get some thai fonts?  Thanks!

	Arthit Suriyawongkul
	Comment 10 • 22 years ago

Long, try this url
http://cgm.cs.mcgill.ca/~luc/thai.html

	Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Comment 11 • 22 years ago

Yes... but this problem happened with ctl enabled binary.
So it's too difficult to verify.

I've assgined QA to Arthit.

Arthit, I'll send you the binary enabled CTL.
Please verify on the binary.

	Arthit Suriyawongkul
	Comment 12 • 22 years ago

tested the binary from Masaki, the issue has been fixed.

	Arthit Suriyawongkul
	Comment 13 • 22 years ago

verified.

	chris hofmann
	Comment 14 • 22 years ago

Comment on attachment 88282 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

a=chofmann for 1.0.1.  add the fixed1.0.1 keyword after checking into the
branch

	Masaki Katakai Assignee
	Comment 15 • 22 years ago

checked into branch.

Thank you very much for approval.

	lchiang
	Comment 16 • 22 years ago

arthit: can you verify this bug fix in 1.01 branch?  When verified, pls replace
fixed1.0.1 keyword with verified1.0.1.  Thanks.