Crash in [@ mozilla::dom::ContentParent::RecvAttachBrowsingContext]
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox66 | --- | unaffected |
firefox67 | --- | unaffected |
firefox68 | blocking | fixed |
People
(Reporter: calixte, Assigned: farre)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, Regression)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, topcrash)
Crash Data
This bug is for crash report bp-851564fc-e643-4c6d-acab-a97a60190408.
Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
0 xul.dll mozilla::dom::ContentParent::RecvAttachBrowsingContext dom/ipc/ContentParent.cpp:5705
1 xul.dll mozilla::dom::PContentParent::OnMessageReceived ipc/ipdl/PContentParent.cpp:9561
2 xul.dll void mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::DispatchMessage ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp:2078
3 xul.dll nsresult mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::MessageTask::Run ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp:1968
4 xul.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:1180
5 xul.dll NS_ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThreadUtils.cpp:486
6 xul.dll void mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run ipc/glue/MessagePump.cpp:110
7 xul.dll MessageLoop::RunHandler ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:308
8 xul.dll MessageLoop::Run ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:290
9 xul.dll nsBaseAppShell::Run widget/nsBaseAppShell.cpp:137
There are 44 crashes (from 29 installations) in nightly 68 with buildid 20190408193006. In analyzing the backtrace, the regression may have been introduced by patch [1] to fix bug 1523636.
[1] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev?node=d76b42f0d6ca
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
I've hit a crash with this signature twice while loading https://www.haaretz.com/ (although I also loaded it once without crashing).
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
This is by far the worst crash in nightly at the moment.
crash reason is "MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT(parent) (Parent doesn't exist in parent process)"
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
With the url given by dbaron which also crashes rather reliably for me I came to this regression range that I think is the best I can get:
I contains bug 1537910, bug 1541810 and bug 1523636 so the theory in comment #0 that bug 1523636 is the regressor sounds plausible.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
This crash didn't show up after the backout, so I'll call this fixed.
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c67c3014b6c891959a12834a471b8e7f7e5db882
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Retroactively moving fixed bugs whose summaries mention "Fission" (or other Fission-related keywords) but are not assigned to a Fission Milestone to an appropriate Fission Milestone.
This will generate a lot of bugmail, so you can filter your bugmail for the following UUID and delete them en masse:
0ee3c76a-bc79-4eb2-8d12-05dc0b68e732
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
Please specify a root cause for this bug. See :tmaity for more information.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
Description of root cause:
Race between parent having closed a browsing context that a child wanted to attach to a tree. Possible sub-category for Coding
could be Parallelism issue
(similar to concurrency, but not the same?)
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•