OSX Mojave (10.14) - ThreadMetrics.CollectMetrics | Expected: (duration) < (200000u), actual: 278857 vs 200000 @ /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/xpcom/tests/gtest/TestThreadMetrics.cpp:153
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect, P5)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox67 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox68 | --- | fixed |
| firefox69 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Assigned: tarek)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
(deleted),
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details |
Filed by: egao [at] mozilla.com
Parsed log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=251074328&repo=try
Full log: https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/MSgzLG2BQAa3UuzSunBogw/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log
Platform: macosx1014-mojave
Context:
02:15:56 INFO - TEST-START | ThreadMetrics.CollectMetrics
02:15:56 WARNING - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | ThreadMetrics.CollectMetrics | Expected: (duration) < (200000u), actual: 278857 vs 200000 @ /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/xpcom/tests/gtest/TestThreadMetrics.cpp:153
02:15:56 WARNING - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | ThreadMetrics.CollectMetrics | test completed (time: 279ms)
|
||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
:froydnj - this appears to be a new failure observed on macosx1014, and only on shippable-opt. Would you be able to take a look, or pass the ni to someone that may be able to comment, thanks!
|
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Tarek it looks like you're most knowledgeable about these tests, can you take a look at this?
|
Assignee | |
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
The first test does not really need to check that we spend less than
200ms, and we can give more time to the scheduler in the second
test, as long as we check that is less than the recursive dispatched
event
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
|
||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
| Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
|
||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
I believe we're migrating 68 to 10.14 as well in support of the next ESR, so a=test-only for uplifting this fix there as well.
|
||
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder uplift | ||
Description
•