Closed Bug 1581528 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

4.73 - 4.78% tsvgx (linux64-shippable-qr) regression on push 7fa90877a45bd1b70b0d49fad6f4cb9718c3b7b7 (Wed September 11 2019)

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla71
Tracking Status
firefox-esr60 --- unaffected
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox69 --- unaffected
firefox70 --- unaffected
firefox71 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: marauder, Assigned: jrmuizel)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?changeset=7fa90877a45bd1b70b0d49fad6f4cb9718c3b7b7

As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

5% tsvgx linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 243.36 -> 254.99
5% tsvgx linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 243.26 -> 254.75

You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=23072

On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.

To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos

For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Running

*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***

Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling

Blocks: 1578356
Component: Performance → Graphics: WebRender
Product: Testing → Core
Regressed by: 1568227
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla71
Version: Version 3 → unspecified
Flags: needinfo?(jmuizelaar)

This is somewhat expected. I'll try to take a look today to better understand why.

Flags: needinfo?(jmuizelaar)

Thank you, Jeff!

Keywords: perf-alert

I had a look at one of the subtests and it looks like we're get some unexpected invalidations.

And it looks like most if not all of this has been recovered by bug 1425871

Or rather bug 1570081

Assignee: nobody → jmuizelaar
Priority: -- → P3

Marian, can we close this as fixed?

Flags: needinfo?(marian.raiciof)

Hi Jeff,
I will close this as fixed and mark the alert accordingly.
Thank you!

Flags: needinfo?(marian.raiciof)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Blocks: 1592626
No longer blocks: 1592626
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.