This is an enhancement request, We have a need to have email sent out to a user who is responsable for a project on a per-product and or per-component basis. This would be more as a monitor ( a bcc ) that would be set up as the products and componets. This would not be the same as the person who is responsable for the product or component from a Technical stand point. this would be more as a management tool. Kevin Barrett

one way is to write it in processmail code (but that's a catchall, can't be configured per-component etc.) see this patch for instance: Index: processmail =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/processmail,v retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.81 processmail --- processmail 14 Apr 2002 04:43:55 -0000 1.81 +++ processmail 31 Jul 2002 13:37:28 -0000 @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ my @emailList = (@assigned_toList, @reporterList, @qa_contactList, @ccList, @voterList); + # TTimo: hack to get email reports + push(@emailList, 'gtkradiant@zerowing.idsoftware.com'); + # only need one entry per person my @allEmail = (); my %AlreadySeen = (); @@ -708,7 +711,14 @@ my $reasonsbody = "------- You are receiving this mail because: -------\n"; if (scalar(@reasons) == 0) { - $reasonsbody .= "Whoops! I have no idea!\n"; + if ($person eq 'gtkradiant@zerowing.idsoftware.com') + { + $reasonsbody = ''; + } + else + { + $reasonsbody .= "Whoops! I have no idea!\n"; + } } else { foreach my $reason (@reasons) { if ($reason eq 'AssignedTo') { -------- However I'd be interested by a cleaner solution (i.e. with UI to configure), and basic rulesets to emit per-component, etc.

Is this a dup of bug 38922?

looks like it

At first glance it would look like it, but, I think of it as more of a variation on the QA contact. The CC list can be changed. I want this to be a fixed list that is set up by product and component. the bug 38922 might assumes that the responsible person for the component and the product/component manager would be the same... In my case it is not the same.... I'd like the add a field just like the QA that can be turn on/off but does not affect the flow of the bug in any way, just gets notified ...

Yeah, this is a dupe of bug 76794. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 76794 ***