Closed Bug 1606917 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

Port the Interventions experiment into a new provider

Categories

(Firefox :: Address Bar, enhancement, P2)

enhancement
Points:
5

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 74
Iteration:
74.2 - Jan 20 - Feb 09
Tracking Status
firefox74 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: bugzilla)

References

(Blocks 2 open bugs)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

No description provided.
Blocks: 1606918
Blocks: 1606919
Priority: -- → P2

I think it will be easier to do this in one patch, rather than porting Interventions then adding the Update (bug 1606918) and Refresh (bug 1606919) interventions separately. I'm going to close those bugs and bump the points on this one.

Assignee: nobody → htwyford
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Iteration: --- → 74.1 - Jan 6 - Jan 19
Points: 3 → 5
Summary: Add an Interventions provider and port the Clear Intervention from the experiment → Port the Interventions experiment into a new provider
Blocks: 1606921
Iteration: 74.1 - Jan 6 - Jan 19 → 74.2 - Jan 20 - Feb 09
Pushed by htwyford@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/4f83b17d63bf Port the Interventions experiment into a new provider. r=adw,fluent-reviewers,Pike
Regressions: 1612903
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 74
Pushed by htwyford@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/391df9744258 Cleanup - Port the Interventions experiment into a new provider. r=adw

== Change summary for alert #24884 (as of Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:36:02 GMT) ==

Improvements:

2% sessionrestore linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 576.46 -> 562.42
2% startup_about_home_paint linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 804.92 -> 787.58

For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=24884

Depends on: 1632918

Was there a particular reason to hardcode the sumo links here rather than using the baseURL method with Services.urlFormatter.formatURLPref to get version+locale appropriate SUMO redirects?

Flags: needinfo?(htwyford)

There was not. Should I file a folllow-up, or has this come up in a patch you're already working on?

Flags: needinfo?(htwyford)

(In reply to Harry Twyford [:harry] from comment #10)

There was not. Should I file a folllow-up, or has this come up in a patch you're already working on?

It's coming up in bug 1693133 because we need a SUMO link there and I thought I'd use the same one that this code used, but then it turned out it wasn't using one. Normally we have to ask the SUMO folks to create a redirect if one doesn't exist, but I don't know if there is one already or not. If you would file a follow-up bug blocking this and bug 1693133 and needinfo Joni (jsavage@) to check what does and doesn't exist already, that would be great. I also don't know if we want different ones per feature to work out where traffic comes from... Again, hopefully they know what to do there...

Flags: needinfo?(htwyford)
Blocks: 1693183
Flags: needinfo?(htwyford)

Sorry for not catching that in review.

Depends on: 1721290
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: