28.06 - 59.77% tsvg_static / tsvgr_opacity / tsvgx (windows7-32-shippable) regression on push b371f612cd60dce156d732f32a50a48eded9d3ab (Wed January 22 2020)
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr68 | --- | unaffected |
firefox72 | --- | unaffected |
firefox73 | --- | unaffected |
firefox74 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: marauder, Assigned: aosmond)
References
(Regression)
Details
(4 keywords)
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:
As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
60% tsvgx windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 122.43 -> 195.60
57% tsvgx windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 121.31 -> 189.93
40% tsvgr_opacity windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 115.75 -> 161.97
28% tsvg_static windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 51.99 -> 66.58
Improvements:
5% tabswitch windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 11.01 -> 10.47
3% tscrollx windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 0.69 -> 0.67
2% tart windows7-32-shippable opt e10s stylo 2.33 -> 2.28
You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=24779
On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.
To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos
For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Running
*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***
Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
This was fixed by the backout of bug 1604535.
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•