Closed
Bug 162779
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Ancient JS GC bug where multiple threads racing to GC may fail to GC at all
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P1)
Core
JavaScript Engine
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.2alpha
People
(Reporter: brendan, Assigned: brendan)
Details
(Keywords: js1.5)
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
shaver
:
review+
jband_mozilla
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Leaving spurious out-of-memory errors. It's due to rt->gcPoke being cleared too
soon if set, in the code near the top of js_GC. Patch coming up.
/be
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
This bug's patch should go into the 1.0 branch as soon as the 1.5 final landing
happens, if not sooner.
/be
Severity: normal → critical
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: js1.5,
mozilla1.2
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.2alpha
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Poke before last ditch call to js_GC from js_AllocGCThing, and clear rt->gcPoke
only after finishing garbage collection, so racing js_GCs see gcPoke set, do
not bail with the early return if (!rt->gcPoke), and flow into the code that
awaits the completion of the garbage collection that's already in progress.
/be
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 95337 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed fix
jband sez sr=jband (thanks again to him for helping test the testcase from a
SpiderMonkey embedder).
/be
Attachment #95337 -
Flags: superreview+
that's nice of him, but for one minor problem:
1.39 brendan%mozilla.org Jul 11 15:43 Out with the old, in with the new.
http://www.mozilla.org/webtools/bonsai/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=reviewers.html&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla-org/html/hacking&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.38&rev2=1.39
you should probably ask shaver to sr, or you could get some other sr to sr based
on jband's word that it's good ;-) -- personally i'd probably ask jband to r=
and get ye old random sr.
otoh, it's possible i missed a nonpublished memo, that happens to me constantly.
anyway, i checked, the document still contains this fragment (it had me worried
for a moment):
Super-review does not require domain expertise (module owners and peers supply
that, usually), so the areas below are not pigeon-holes -- you can solicit a
super-review from any reviewer on the list, but using area as a guide will get
quicker results in the typical case.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Timeless, settle down.
/be
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #95337 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Forgot all the other early return paths, which are now fused with a done: block
at the bottom of js_GC that (if !(gcflags & GC_ALREADY_LOCKED)) unlocks
rt->gcLock, then calls the JSGC_END callback (jband, this restores symmetry
with JSGC_BEGIN, which was broken before -- can you review?).
/be
Attachment #95713 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
The JSGC_END GC-callback case, by design, is not called for every racing GC
attempt that synchronizes with the thread actually collecting garbage -- it
must be called only on the thread actually collecting garbage, after it has
finished and released rt->gcLock. My last patch gratuitously and overzealously
(I was motivated by code-sharing interests, to fuse the 'if (!(gcflags &
GC_ALREADY_LOCKED)) JS_UNLOCK_GC(rt);' statement) made all racing GC-threads
call the GC-callback with JSGC_END. This would at best do unnecessary work and
at worst break someone.
JSGC_BEGIN is different because we want any thread trying to start GC, before
it has found another thread already collecting garbage, to be able to cause an
early return from js_GC, via a false return from the GC-callback.
Looking for r= and (jband again) sr=.
/be
Attachment #95714 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #96220 -
Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 96220 [details] [diff] [review]
oops, don't break JSGC_END's semantic
r=shaver
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
jband's around, I have hopes he'll stamp sr= after reading this diff.
/be
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 96220 [details] [diff] [review]
oops, don't break JSGC_END's semantic
sr=jband looks reasonable to me
Attachment #96220 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Fixed in the trunk.
/be
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•