html/user-activation/* tests are almost all expected TIMEOUT or Fail
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P5)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox77 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jmaher, Assigned: jmaher)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details |
In web-platform-tests, there are 9 of 12 tests which are expected TIMEOUT or fail. Most of these are found with origin in the filename.
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/web-platform/meta/html/user-activation
locally on windows10, I verified a failure running:
./mach wpt testing/web-platform/tests//html/user-activation/consumption-sameorigin.tentative.html
and saw this in the ./mach console:
0:55.97 TEST_START: /html/user-activation/consumption-sameorigin.tentative.html
0:56.58 pid:24176 JavaScript error: http://web-platform.test:8000/html/user-activation/resources/child-one.html, line 6: TypeError: can't access property "isActive", navigator.userActivation is undefined
0:56.59 pid:24176 JavaScript error: http://web-platform.test:8000/html/user-activation/resources/consumption-sameorigin-child.html, line 7: TypeError: can't access property "isActive", navigator.userActivation is undefined
0:56.67 pid:24176 JavaScript error: http://web-platform.test:8000/html/user-activation/resources/child-two.html, line 6: TypeError: can't access property "isActive", navigator.userActivation is undefined
1:06.55 TEST_END: Test TIMEOUT. Subtests passed 0/8. Unexpected 0
I am thinking we don't support userActivation?
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
:hsinyi, can you find someone to look at these tests and determine if there is anything we can do to get them passing or indicate if this is not supported?
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Edgar can help answer the question and suggest the next step. :)
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
We don't support navigator.userActivation
, the API is not defined in spec yet, see bug 1591902 and https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4009.
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Sounds like this should be implementation-status: backlog
unless we have a standards-position that the proposal is harmful.
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
As Edgar mentioned, the API isn't even in the spec and the tests are tentative.
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
run html/user-activation/ tests as backlog (tier-2)
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Description
•