Closed
Bug 1667334
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Crash in [@ std::_Func_impl_no_alloc<T>::_Do_call] called from mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1667491
| Fission Milestone | M6c |
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr78 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox81 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox82 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox83 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: jcristau, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression)
Crash Data
Crash report: https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/6cc3f0b6-e9c6-48d6-aeb0-90d010200924
Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
0 xul.dll std::_Func_impl_no_alloc<`lambda at /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/layout/base/nsDocumentViewer.cpp:1219:20', void, mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext*>::_Do_call
1 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:844
2 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:850
3 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:850
4 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:850
5 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:850
6 xul.dll mozilla::dom::BrowsingContext::PreOrderWalk docshell/base/BrowsingContext.cpp:850
7 xul.dll nsDocumentViewer::PermitUnload layout/base/nsDocumentViewer.cpp:1219
8 xul.dll nsDocShell::InternalLoad docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp:9171
9 xul.dll nsDocShell::LoadURI docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp:876
The signature is unhelpful but these crashes seem to be spiking up in nightly 83.
I'll file a bug to get the signature improved.
|
Reporter | |
Updated•4 years ago
|
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Tracking for Fission M6c
Severity: -- → S3
Fission Milestone: --- → M6c
Priority: -- → P2
|
|
||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Bug 1667491 looks like the same crash, and it has a test case. This is probably a regression from the same patch as the other bug.
Regressed by: 1655866
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•