Enable reftests on Pixel2 for SW-WR
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, task)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox90 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: sotaro, Assigned: sotaro)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details |
Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Would it possibly make more sense to run these on the Moto G5? Will need to confirm the device availability on CI, but it might take some pressure off the limited number of Pixel 2s. Plus the Moto g5 run arm32, which is more similar to the devices we expect to need software webrender on.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the advice!
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
Reftest could run on Pixel2.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=9c97062139870c9546868d41970a843dcb52d896
But when I tried to run reftest on MotoG5, tests did not run.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=d908c7285ba110c433268c2324987743a0cb6993
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=f08913f967d569c6e62229ea16d8e69e58a550af
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
:jmaher, :aosmond, :jnicol, do you know what is wrong to run reftests on MotoG5 as in comment 3?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sotaro Ikeda [:sotaro] from comment #4)
:jmaher, :aosmond, :jnicol, do you know what is wrong to run reftests on MotoG5 as in comment 3?
Going to enable test with 32bit build on Pixel2 instead of MogoG5.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•4 years ago
|
||
Hmm, screenshot did not work well.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=9e35d9eb1ee53bf25c87d16fd8c57c81215525bf
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
as for G5 we have very low capacity there- the two try pushes timed out, that is the exception (we have a 24 hour limit to pick up a task). As for P2 we have more capacity for unittests- when we renewed the contract for these phones all jobs were validated and any spare capacity was removed as much as we could. There were no plans to add more jobs.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•4 years ago
|
||
Thank you for the explanation :)
:jmaher, is it OK to add reftests with 32bit debug build to Pixel2?
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
if you want it to stick around and not be backed out, I would schedule reftest-qr, not reftest. We just vetted all the jobs running in February, so I doubt there is much we could kick out to make room for duplicating reftest-qr. reftest-qr is intended to be a reduced set of reftests that are most likely to uncover issues on android based on code changes and bugs over time.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•4 years ago
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•4 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•4 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Description
•