Rendering of extremely tall content becomes erratic after 16M device pixels height
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr91 | --- | affected |
firefox95 | --- | wontfix |
firefox96 | --- | wontfix |
firefox97 | --- | wontfix |
firefox98 | --- | fix-optional |
People
(Reporter: jfkthame, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs, Regression)
Details
(Keywords: correctness, regression)
Attachments
(3 files)
View the attached testcase on a non-hidpi screen.
The main test element here is just over 16M pixels tall. Scroll to the very bottom, and observe the erratic rendering of the last line -- glyphs are shifted up/down from the proper baseline, and the glyph bitmaps may be broken (e.g. stretched or squashed by a pixel).
The effect also occurs on a Retina screen, though it is a bit less obvious; but there it begins half-way down the document, implying that the critical height is 16M device pixels, not CSS px. (Similarly, on a Windows display with 150% scaling, the corruption begins about 2/3 of the way down the document.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
Mozregression points to https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=02b89c29412b6c1444fe32a4847e5261e2bb3d00&tochange=2ccc6648064315964dd23039ad28ebf7d9f82999 as when this started happening.
Of the patches in that range, I wonder if Bug 1545006 - Use external scroll offsets to move primitives and clips into local space might be the issue?
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
Really interesting test case. I can reproduce on windows.
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Seems like a dupe of bug 1667534 and bug 1629859.
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
I got a different, later regression range: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=a35461d1fc07e6e855d064453363a46d32bb5a3d&tochange=bd7c35b7e234712f94f6dbb755ad983c1db8b07b. I'm not able to spot an obvious candidate regressor.
Comment 7•3 years ago
|
||
Can't repro when setting layers.async-pan-zoom.enabled:false!
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
Does this occur on non-Windows platforms and/or with gfx.webrender.compositor
disabled (restart required)?
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Glenn Watson [:gw] from comment #8)
Does this occur on non-Windows platforms and/or with
gfx.webrender.compositor
disabled (restart required)?
Yes.
Gnome Wayland, Debian Testing, Intel Iris Graphics 6100 (BDW GT3), 2560x1440
STR: Zoom to 500% and press End to scroll to the bottom.
Reproducible with:
mozregression --launch 2021-08-28 --pref gfx.webrender.software:true -a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9236904
mozregression --launch 2021-08-28 --pref gfx.webrender.all:true -a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9236904
MOZ_X11_EGL=1 mozregression --launch 2021-08-28 --pref gfx.webrender.all:true -a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9236904
MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 mozregression --launch 2021-08-28 --pref gfx.webrender.all:true -a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9236904
MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 mozregression --launch 2021-08-28 --pref gfx.webrender.all:true gfx.webrender.compositor:true -a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9236904
Not reproducible:
with layers.async-pan-zoom.enabled:false
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 10•3 years ago
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 11•3 years ago
|
||
Can confirm that layers.async-pan-zoom.enabled = false
also avoids Bug 1673939 with Fission disabled. Since this bug is very similar and has the same regression window per Comment 2, I think it's fair to say that it is also regressed by Bug 1545006.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 13•2 years ago
|
||
Unassigning for now, as I'm not actively working on this right now.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 16•2 years ago
|
||
The severity field for this bug is set to S4
. However, the following bug duplicate has higher severity:
- Bug 1667534: S3
:bhood, could you consider increasing the severity of this bug to S3
?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•