102.3.1 contact lookup (again/still) not working
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Address Book, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: tymcik, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [closeme 2023-02-25])
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/105.0
Steps to reproduce:
After the address book and lookup issues of v102 were seemingly solved I returned from v91 and reinstalled 102.3. The lookup was better, but some addresses were missing after sync and many others were doubled – the "second"s always had a local time label added.
Actual results:
I dumped the CardDAF subscription and loaded it again.
Now seemingly all addresses were added, only once - but lookup in an email doesn't find them. Neiter first, nor second name. And - as before - the names I need most frequently.
Expected results:
lookup should find the existing addresses.
The extension Provider für CalDAV & CardDAV worked well - TB who took over, does not.
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
In Bug 1782692 (solved), in case of occurring problems we were asked to report a new bug. Here it is.
Now it seems lookup is broken completely, no contacts turn up whatsoever.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Felix, still having problems? Current release version is TB 102.7.1.
(In reply to Felix Tymcik from bug 1782692 comment #22)
Everything works for me (Mac OS 10.15.7) since 102.3.x, you have to reload your contacts and name (again) the default address book source.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Felix, it is difficult to provide assistance to abandoned bug reports.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
I'm sorry. As a mediocre user without programmer's expertise, I had to move on.
I found a thread where someone claimed that a newer version works. I followed that thread and after someone confirmed it, I installed it, deleted all actual data, retrieved an older, working database, added by hand the missing new ones I kept in a text file, merged two sources and spent hours deleting a few hundred doublettes.
Sorry for not reporting on this - albeit strenuous - success.
As far as I remember my clean up action was still within the 102.3's or early ff's and it works since, I'm using 102.10.1 by now.
Thank you for your expertise and engagement!
Description
•