Closed
Bug 181495
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
change xpcom so that callers do not need to know that a class is a service
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, enhancement)
Core
XPCOM
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
DUPLICATE
of bug 181513
People
(Reporter: timeless, Assigned: timeless)
Details
(Keywords: arch)
People want to believe that being a service is an implementation detail, but the
fact is that it isn't. There is no way for something to find out if the
implementation of a contract is a service and therefore "must" be accessed by
using getService() instead of createInstance(). Someone suggested using
nsIClassInfo, but the catch 22 is that to use classinfo you need a class which
means either calling getService() or createInstance() -- and in today's world if
you call the wrong one, bad things will happen.
I'll attach a discussion, some ideas and other stuff later, for the time being I
just need this bug so I can reference it elsewhere.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 181513 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•