With 112, emptying imap trash folder shows the list of messages until the imap trash folder is re-selected
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Folder and Message Lists, defect)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr102 unaffected, thunderbird111 wontfix)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
thunderbird_esr102 | --- | unaffected |
thunderbird111 | --- | wontfix |
People
(Reporter: gds, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [Supernova3p])
With 112 and possibly 111, emptying an imap trash folder doesn't immediately clear the list of messages that were permanently deleted. You have to select/open another folder and then come back to the trash folder for the list of messages to go away.
I've only tested this with imap-c++ and don't know of any changes there that would cause this.
My trash folders don't have offline store. Haven't tried it with trash having offline store.
I think this only affects imap trash folders since emptying the trash of Local Folders worked as expected (list of messages goes away without a re-select).
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
This reproduces on 111. I did not test current 112
Updated•2 years ago
|
(In reply to gene smith from comment #0)
With 112 and possibly 111, emptying an imap trash folder doesn't immediately clear the list of messages that were permanently deleted. You have to select/open another folder and then come back to the trash folder for the list of messages to go away.
I've only tested this with imap-c++ and don't know of any changes there that would cause this.
My trash folders don't have offline store. Haven't tried it with trash having offline store.I think this only affects imap trash folders since emptying the trash of Local Folders worked as expected (list of messages goes away without a re-select).
Muchas gracias.
Si, eso mismo es lo que me pasa a mí.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
I'm not seeing this now with a fairly recent self-build 114 daily. Must have gotten fixed as a side-effect of some other change.
But don't know what you mean by "it has been slower". I don't see any problem with the speed of "empty trash" activities (on linux).
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Good enough then to close.
Description
•