PDF annotations not saved on certain PDFs
Categories
(Firefox :: PDF Viewer, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr102 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr115 | --- | wontfix |
firefox115 | --- | wontfix |
firefox116 | --- | fixed |
firefox117 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: pmenzel+bugzilla.mozilla.org, Assigned: calixte)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/117.0
Steps to reproduce:
This is a regression since at least Firefox 115.0. It also does not work with Nightly 117.0a1 (20230715213801).
Open the attached PDF, make annotation and add text, and save it.
Actual results:
The annotations and added text are not saved.
Expected results:
It should be saved.
We only found this one PDF, that worked in the past. It works with other PDF files. Re-rendering the PDF file by plainly printing it, it works again.
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Firefox::PDF Viewer' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Could you try using mozregression to figure out exactly what caused this issue?
Updated•1 year ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Unfortunately I never got it to work, and do not have time to further look into it. A colleague reported, that they tried older versions, and it didn’t work in 112.0 (from April 2023) either. But they are pretty, pretty sure it had worked in the past.
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
I can reproduce, I'll try to use mozregression myself.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
It's because the Acroform
entry in Root isn't a reference and we're finally throwing when we try to write the acroformRef
which is null:
https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/0702663b7d994bf363328d6b818ded30605a5378/src/core/writer.js#L266C14
Since Root
should be a reference (from specs Required; shall be an indirect reference
), I think we must rewrite it in such case.
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
10:18.83 INFO: Last good revision: ef7f2899709705172b238d1ef7b9022ed98b290f
10:18.83 INFO: First bad revision: b78719ac48b811337492748d74fa73013b3e752f
10:18.83 INFO: Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=ef7f2899709705172b238d1ef7b9022ed98b290f&tochange=b78719ac48b811337492748d74fa73013b3e752f
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
That said in this case we don't have to update Acroform.
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1800502
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:calixte, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
- If yes, please nominate the patch for beta approval.
- If no, please set
status-firefox116
towontfix
.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•