Closed
Bug 215972
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
wish: possibility to synchronise remote calendar
Categories
(Calendar :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 274967
People
(Reporter: k_b0000, Assigned: mostafah)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030812
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030812
if sharing a calendar, and not using the auto publish option and not using
publish selected events, it would be good with a synchronize option.
why?
if one adds a number of events and wants to publish them it is tempting to use
the publish entire calendar. however if some other person added notes that you
have not yet downloaded, they will vanish if you publish the entire calendar.
on the other hand, if you add events to your calendar, and then select refresh
remote calendars your new local entries will be lost.
therefor a synchronize option would be needed.
perhaps it shoud run in this order:
1. download, all from calender, do not remove your local.
2. upload your local to caledar.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Isn't this how publish works now?
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
no, it isn't. Publish just publishes your local data without looking at the
remote data.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, so this is how auto-publish on a subscribed calendar currently works.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
This would be nice
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: gurganbl → general
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Is this a duplicate of Bug 274967?
I guess it's this one that should be marked as a duplicate since Bug 274967 has patches and stuff in it =)
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 274967 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•