I don't know if this has been reported before, I have no idea what to look for. Sorry about that. I just received an e-mail (see attachment for complete message) which was totally confusing to me. It mixes up the bug it refers to and a dependency. As far as I can see after looking at those bugs, these are two different things which were combined in on mail. Let me show you in detail what confused me: > bzbarsky@mit.edu changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED OK, Boris changed the status to resolved, but resolved what? > Bug 84887 depends on bug 38370, which changed state. Well, OK, a blocking bug did change. How could that do the change above? It did not, but this is how it looked to me. > Bug 38370 Summary: Can't change <HR> and <BR> color > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38370 > > What |Old Value |New Value > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |FIXEDBug 84887 depends on bug 38370, which changed state. OK, great, that other bug was fixed. But why is the dependency repeated here, this was stated above already? > Bug 38370 Summary: Can't change <HR> and <BR> color > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38370 Again? > What |Old Value |New Value > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |FIXED It said so just before, why again? But waid, is that what the original bug (84887) was changed to? After all this information was still missing. But just above it says something about the other bug (38370). > ------- Additional Comments From bzbarsky@mit.edu 2003-09-25 16:48 ------- > Fixed by bug 38370. Ah, finally the comment to the first change. So here is my suggestion how to solve it. If we want to combine different incidents in one mail (I don't think we should, but this is not the question here), then each incident should be given completly, seperated by a clear marker like a line like this: --------------------- change n ------------------------------------ pi

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 179351 ***

Appreciated. pi