Closed Bug 224123 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

Large progressive JPEG doesn't display

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 9922

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: jdunn)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 I have a case on my Mozilla 1.5 where a large PROGRESSIVE JPEG does NOT work. When converting it to a 'normal' JPEG it works just fine, see: http://www.mindblow.ch/bugzilla/img1.jpeg But http://www.mindblow.ch/bugzilla/img2.jpeg doesn't render on my machine. It does reserve the space for it and displays the magnifier and so on but does not display a single pixel... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://www.mindblow.ch/bugzilla/img2.jpeg Actual Results: Nothing is being displayed Expected Results: Display the pic
Worksforme, current linux trunk build (2003-10-26-05)
Confirming on 20031015 Firebird/0.7, WinXP. Off to ImageLib.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Image: Layout → ImageLib
Ever confirmed: true
Whiteboard: DUPEME
Is it bug #9922, or are progressive JPEGs a different issue?
Well, Bug 9922 appears to be resolved to my untrained eye since ALL testpics posted there DO work on my 1.5 and also other people said that there... MY Problem here only seems to appear with PROGRESSIVE JPEGs. I usually use progressive jpegs for everything I do so I stumbled over this problem. Also all the pics in Bug 9922 ARE 'normal' (or however this is called) JPEGs. So my guess is that the only problem with big JPEGs at the moment are the progressive ones. Matt
Using a debug build I get the following message: JPEG decoding error: Image too wide for this implementation see jerror.h -> JERR_WIDTH_OVERFLOW Something with being progressive must be throwing off the jpeg library. We are bombing out in jmemmgr.c line 457, ltemp = 0
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9922 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Whiteboard: DUPEME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.