Open
Bug 22474
Opened 25 years ago
Updated 7 years ago
new folder named <\.....\> names do not display consistently on the UI
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect)
SeaMonkey
MailNews: Message Display
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: huang, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/plain
|
Details |
Used WinNT 12-21-00-M12 commercial build:
This bug is refer to bug#17681, I logged this bug for keep track of all
platforms and the UI part.
Overview: The UI did not display the consistent folder name "<.....>" when
creating folders
1) Login to mail account (ex: IMAP account)
2) Created folder name "<\.....\>"
3) Check the IMAP protocol log file can see the correct folder name "<\.....\>"
4) But tried to check the folder name from the UI.
5) Actual Results: Folder Name is not consistent with the log file, the UI
displayed ">" instead of the "<\.....\>".
Expected results: Since from bug#17681, "<\.....\>" is the legal folders'
name...so the UI should displayed this folder name "<\.....\>" as well.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
I have suggestion, this bug's implementation milestone is better set after we
can impletement "delete folders". Otherwise, it will keep asking "folder already
existed" from the Linux platform when I tried to test or verify for the second
time. The winNT didn't display "folder already existed" message... I may need to
log another bug for keep track of that!! Thanks.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: phil → alecf
Target Milestone: M16
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Reassign to alecf. Since it just fails for this weird name, this doesn't seem
like a beta1 stopper. Marking M16
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•25 years ago
|
Summary: Created Folders' names did not display consistently on the UI → new folder named \<...\> names do not display consistently on the UI
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Update this bug's current status by Using 02-28-09-M15 cmmercial build:
The Actual Result is as following:
The folder name displayed "<\......\" instead of "<\......\>" on the IMAP log &
UI which is not correct, the trailing ">" has been truncated.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
how is this working these days?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Used today's 04-13-06-M15 commercial build:
From Netscape6 UI, it displayed "<\.....\", final ">" disappear on UI
(similar to bug#29581)
But, from IMAP log, it used to display correctly, but now it is displaying
"<\\.....\\"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:SendData: 12 create "<\\.....\\"
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 12 OK Completed
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:SendData: 13 subscribe "<\\.....\\"
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 13 OK Completed
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:SendData: 14 list "" "<\\.....\\"
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * LIST (\HasNoChildren)
"/" {8}
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: <\.....\
204[2eb3860]: nsmail-5:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 14 OK Completed
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:NA:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * OK tintin.mcom.com IMAP4
service (Netscape Messaging Server 4.1 (built Aug 9 1999))
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:NA:SendData: 1 authenticate plain
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:NA:CreateNewLineFromSocket: +
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:NA:SendData: AHFhdGVzdDMwAE5lIXNjLXBl
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:NA:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 1 OK User logged in (no
protection)
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:SendData: 2 XSERVERINFO MANAGEACCOUNTURL MANAGELISTSURL
MANAGEFILTERSURL
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * XSERVERINFO MANAGEACCOUNTURL
{63}
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket:
http://qatest30@tintin.mcom.com:9999/bin/user/admin/bin/enduser MANAGELISTSURL
NIL MANAGEFILTERSURL NIL
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 2 OK Completed
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:SendData: 3 select "<\\.....\\"
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged
\Draft \Deleted \Seen)
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS
(\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * 0 EXISTS
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * 0 RECENT
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 955647492]
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 3 OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:S-<\.....\:SendData: 4 getacl "<\\.....\\"
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:S-<\.....\:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * ACL {8}
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:S-<\.....\:CreateNewLineFromSocket: <\.....\ qatest30
lrswipcda
215[361cbf0]: nsmail-5:S-<\.....\:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 4 OK Completed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary: new folder named \<...\> names do not display consistently on the UI → new folder named <\.....\> names do not display consistently on the UI
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Removing b3mail keyword (these bugs have been promoted now.)
Keywords: b3mail
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
ugh... putterman? bienvenu?
Assignee: alecf → bienvenu
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
marking nsbeta1- because it does not affect a large number of users.
Keywords: nsbeta1-
Updated•23 years ago
|
Blocks: folders-with-special-characters
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
I see what I think is a related problem.
Create a local folder named "A/B" (don't include the " characters).
If you try to rename it, you get the message: "The folder could not be renamed.
Perhaps the folder is being reparsed, or the new name is no a valid folder name."
Similarly, attempts to delete such a folder silently fail. I.e., the folder
remains shown in the folder tree.
It seems like maybe the "new folder" code is using a less restrictive standard
than necessary for checking folder names.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
>It seems like maybe the "new folder" code is using a less restrictive standard
>than necessary for checking folder names.
I think so too.
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
I have the exact same issue as comment #15 but it does not deal with the
slashes. Instead, I had a folder with a # in it (abc #123). It is a valid name
and Mozilla 1.1 worked with it but when I upgraded to 1.4, the folder was no
longer accessible and trying to rename it kept throwing the error that comment
#15 has about it being reparsed.
Ended up renaming the actual files themselves to remove the #.
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
Should we look for a way to add the check of '..','.','#',etc in mozilla.
Simplely replace them with '_' is ok sometimes when users create folder contains
these charactors. Who will recomment a resolute?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: bienvenu → nobody
Priority: P2 → --
QA Contact: huang → message-display
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 19•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Status: NEW → UNCONFIRMED
Comment 20•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 21•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 22•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 23•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 24•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 25•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 26•15 years ago
|
||
MASS-CHANGE:
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but still has no comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project 5 years ago.
Because of this, we're resolving the bug as EXPIRED.
If you still can reproduce the bug on SeaMonkey 2 or otherwise think it's still valid, please REOPEN it and if it is a platform or toolkit issue, move it to the according component.
Query tag for this change: EXPIRED-20100420
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
Comment 27•14 years ago
|
||
Still buggy: <\.....\> gets created as <\.....\
My university's webmailer claims that <\.....\> is an invalid name, so this needs investigation either way.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Ever confirmed: true
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Comment 28•7 years ago
|
||
It fails silently for me (OVH server).
Thunderbird 52.1.1 (32-bit)
Windows 7 64-bit
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•