Closed
Bug 236060
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Shouldn't refer to "Mozilla menu on Mac" OS X in "System" section
Categories
(Documentation Graveyard :: Help Viewer, defect)
Documentation Graveyard
Help Viewer
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: stefanh, Assigned: stefanh)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: late-l10n)
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
neil
:
review+
mkaply
:
approval1.7+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Missed/didn't see this when fixing bug 210335... (sigh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee: rlk → stefan_h
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142643 -
Flags: review?(rlk)
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Why wouldn't this be Mozilla menu? Do we have preferences in two locations on MacOS?
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
i don't think we have system preferences under mac os
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
> i don't think we have system preferences under mac os
We don't:
Line 351: <p><b>Note</b>: The System preferences panel appears only on Windows-
based platforms.</p>
IMHO that could be made clearer :)
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 142643 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
neil: can you review this? I'm not too experienced on mac and want to make sure
this is correct.
Attachment #142643 -
Flags: review?(rlk) → review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 142643 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
The internal name for the system pref panel is winhooks :-) I do wonder why
this uses 1. and 2. instead of <ol> and <li> though...
Attachment #142643 -
Flags: review?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> (From update of attachment 142643 [details] [diff] [review])
> The internal name for the system pref panel is winhooks :-) I do wonder why
> this uses 1. and 2. instead of <ol> and <li> though...
>
Neil, can you check this in? This is just a simple correction of the fix in bug
210335, so it would be cool to have it in for the 1.7 release :)
The lack of <ol> and <li> will be fixed in bug 236942.
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
>it would be cool to have it in for the 1.7 release :)
Then you'd better request approval...
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142643 -
Flags: approval1.7?
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 142643 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
a=mkaply
Please note this l10n change in seamonkey and l10n newsgroups and add the
late-l10n keyword.
Thanks
Attachment #142643 -
Flags: approval1.7? → approval1.7+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Patch checked in by Neil --> Fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•