Closed
Bug 240148
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
<table height="100%"></table> takes up space (gap on sonique.lycos.com)
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 241161
People
(Reporter: ht990332, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 Firefox/0.8.0+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 Firefox/0.8.0+
When I open http://sonique.lycos.com , there is a gap at the top of the page.
This bug did not exist in mozilla 1.6
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open http://sonique.lycos.com
2.Notice the big gap at the top of the page
Actual Results:
there is a big gap at the top of the page.
Expected Results:
there shouldn't be a big gap at the top of the page
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
See http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://sonique.lycos.com
it gives a fatal error
Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
but somehow it used to render correctly in firefox0.8 (1.6)
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Summary: There is a big gap at the top of the page → There is a big gap at the top of the page sonique.lycos.com
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Can somebody confirm this ?
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8a?
Flags: blocking1.7?
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
confirming firefox 20040409 trunk
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Where's the minimal testcase people? Without a minimal testcase a layout bug
can't be fixed (and shouldn't be set to NEW in most cases).
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8a?
Flags: blocking1.8a-
Flags: blocking1.7?
Flags: blocking1.7-
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
simplified testcase attached
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Hussam, thank you for the testcase.
Bernard, please read
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=ac50fff3f060ead7
Bernd, didn't we recently make empty tables like that actually display, whereas
they used not to? Should we just evangelize this site, or should we make not
displaying them a quirk?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Summary: There is a big gap at the top of the page sonique.lycos.com → <table height="100%"></table> takes up space (gap on sonique.lycos.com)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Ok, I got some input about this from a couple of people.
what's happening here is that after opening the table, there are some script
elements. Firefox0.8 closes the table right after those script elements whereas
firefox0.8 (1.6 ) did not. Hence, the rest of the page is not being included in
the table because the table is now closed.
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
> Firefox0.8 closes the table right after those script elements whereas
> firefox0.8 (1.6 ) did not.
Er... you're talking about the same browser version there?
Looks like this table-closing issue is what we need a testcase for?
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
sorry I meant 0.8+ (1.7 ) and firefox 0.8 (1.6)
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Ah, ok. Note that I doubt that our parsing changed here (which is what comment
7 claims to have happened; that's why I'd love to see a testcase showing that
comment to be correct).
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
After thinking about this, the table closing issue seems to be another bug, so I
think the testcase attached is valid.
If you view the testcase in firebird0.8 (1.6), the empty table won't shove the
the rest of the page down.
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Right. Per standards it SHOULD shove it all the way down. The only question is
whether we want to violate standards in this case, and if so how.
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
This was also an issue on Mozilla 1.6!!
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
This bug also creates a large gap on http://www.girlpaladin.com/introverts.html.
(I made a testcase and it was essentially the same as the one here.)
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
fixed by checkin for bug 241161
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 241161 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•