Phil Peterson Reporter
	Description • 25 years ago

On Mac: 2.48s on 4.7 vs 12.3s on mozilla. Must be within 2x of 4.7 to meet beta1
criteria.

	leger
	Comment 1 • 25 years ago

Putting on PDT+ radar for beta1.

	chriss
	Comment 2 • 25 years ago

Since this is a one time operation, I wouldn't hold beta for it. Clearing PDT+ 
and kicking back to the PDT

	Alec Flett
	Comment 3 • 25 years ago

this is the load of any folder from the IMAP server, it happens every time you 
login to the IMAP server and load your inbox, or every time you visit another 
folder.

	scottputterman
	Comment 4 • 25 years ago

Even if they only read one folder per session it still leaves a bad impression 
and to users of 4.7 it will feel like a pretty big regression.

Regardless of whether or not this is marked PDT+ I think we should work on this 
(i.e., I think it's wrong to remove PDT+)

	Phil Peterson Reporter
	Comment 5 • 25 years ago

I agree with PDT+ and will argue this at today's PDT mtg.

	David :Bienvenu
	Comment 6 • 25 years ago

Is this the time to download all the headers, or the time to open an imap folder 
for which all headers have been downloaded? There's not much that's 
imap-specific about the latter, but there is a lot of stuff going on in the 
former. Often, this boils down to inefficiencies in the xpcom proxy stuff 
because we rely quite heavily on it. One thing the xpcom proxy stuff does is 
create an new event queue for every proxied event - I don't know if this is slow 
on the mac or now.

	Phil Peterson Reporter
	Comment 7 • 25 years ago

I believe this does not include header download time. I've added the URL to
suresh's performance timings in the URL field of this bug.

	daver
	Comment 8 • 25 years ago

moving back to [PDT+]

	scottputterman
	Comment 9 • 25 years ago

putting UNKNOWN in the status whiteboard.  I could probably keep working on perf 
bugs until I'm told to stop.

	Phil Peterson Reporter
	Comment 10 • 25 years ago

We've had great improvement here. If we don't have further progress, or a plan
for progress, I'd make this PDT- on Friday 2/25.

	scottputterman
	Comment 11 • 25 years ago

I checked in what will get checked in for beta.  I'm changing to PDT-

	selmer (gone)
	Comment 12 • 25 years ago

Not M16 stopper.  Marking M17.

	scottputterman
	Comment 13 • 24 years ago

moving to M18 and nominating for beta3.

	scottputterman
	Comment 14 • 24 years ago

Mail triage marking [nsbeta3+]

	lchiang
	Comment 15 • 24 years ago

second pass: - per mail triage.

Pratik - for the record, can you post current timings for the Mac performance 
test results into this bug report?

	Pratik Dhupia
	Comment 16 • 24 years ago

For the record:
To load an IMAP folder with 1000 messages: 

NS6 : 9.6 seconds. 
NS4.7 : 2.48 seconds.

	scottputterman
	Comment 17 • 24 years ago

changing summary since it's not just a beta3 issue.

	stephend@netscape.com (gone - use stephen.donner@gmail.com instead)
	Comment 18 • 24 years ago

I've created bug 63759 which is a performance tracker bug for mail/news.

	scottputterman
	Comment 19 • 24 years ago

changing summary to reflect fact that all folders load slow. Changing platform
to all because all of them are slow.  Marking nsbeta1+ and moving to mozilla0.8
though it is likely to get moved out as more research is done.

reassigning to sspitzer.

	scottputterman
	Comment 20 • 24 years ago

moving to mozilla0.9

	scottputterman
	Comment 21 • 24 years ago

*** Bug 6873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

	stephend@netscape.com (gone - use stephen.donner@gmail.com instead)
	Comment 22 • 24 years ago

This might be marked fixed if we make 4.x parity with the new perf branch 
merging.  Otherwise, we might keep it open to address the difference.

	(not reading, please use seth@sspitzer.org instead) Assignee
	Comment 23 • 24 years ago

marking fixed.

any futher issues with folder loaded should go into a new bug.

the problems that this bug orignally covered has been fixed.

	stephend@netscape.com (gone - use stephen.donner@gmail.com instead)
	Comment 24 • 24 years ago

VERIFIED FIXED.  http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/win_performance_results.html

If we have future enhancements, those need to be filed seperately.