Closed
Bug 26638
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
HTTP/1.1 support for "enhanced" caching - reducing GETs
Categories
(Core :: Networking, enhancement, P5)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: rbelmar, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: perf, Whiteboard: [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2-] [nsbeta3-][necko-would-take])
In current 4.x browser we (Hughes Network Systems) have found that when items
are available in the cache the browser must still send a GET request to the web
server to validate the freshness of the object. MSIE 5.x "learns" that if the
response from the server continues to be "not modified" then it will stop
sending the GET request for that object and immediately load from cache (during
the same user session of the browser). This behavior is permited by HTTP/1.1
(but not defined in HTTP/1.0) and is critical for satellite-based networks
where it is important to minimize the number of round-trips from client to host
across the satellite link.
Changing assignee.
Assignee: gordon@netscape.com → gordon
Target Milestone: M16
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M17 which is now considered part of beta2.
Target Milestone: M16 → M17
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Warren - do you consider this a feature or a bug
Keywords: beta2
Whiteboard: 1d → 1d [nsbeta2+ till 5/16]
Is this done? Does Hughes need it?
Whiteboard: 1d [nsbeta2+ till 5/16] → [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2+ till 5/16]
It's not done, but I don't know about Hughes. Ruslan, does the HTTP/1.1 spec
detail an algorithm for "learning" that a URL is "not modified"?
From what I can tell we support etags and if-modified-since as well as expires
header. We do not support all the featues of Vary. What capability exactly are
we talking about that IE supports and we don't?
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
The first paragraph of this bug outlines the specific feature Gordon was after.
It involves "learning" that the result of GET is consistently "not modified" and
henceforth (in the browsing session) not bothernig to check anymore.
I'm marking this bug beta2-, as it has gotten too late to land it.
I'm nominating for beta3 as this is quite crucial to use in satellite link
applicaitons (for folks like Hughes). This is not a "user visible" feature, but
rather impacts performance in a high latency scenario.
This bug is performance bug is quite critcal to Hughes, and I'd like to see it
handled if possible.
Thanks,
Jim
Still, if somebody will enlighten me what exactly we need to be doing that we
are NOT doing already (apart from a few known bugs) - I'll appreciate it. We
tried to follow 1.1 spec very precisely lately.
not criticial enough to stop ship for nsbeta3
Whiteboard: [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2-] → [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2-] [nsbeta3-]
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Adding darin to cc list.
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
HTTP could accomplish this by storing the relevant learned time period in the
meta data of the cache entry. It could then check this before going out for
an if-modified-since request.
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Reassigning to HTTP.
Assignee: gordon → neeti
Component: Networking: Cache → Networking: HTTP
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
dropping dependency on bug 65092 - this bug does not block mozilla's compliance
with HTTP/1.1.
No longer blocks: 65092
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
moving neeti's futured bugs for triaging.
Assignee: neeti → new-network-bugs
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
I've created a test page for the issue as I understand it:
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/mozilla/get_target.php?foo=bar
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
-> me
Assignee: new-network-bugs → darin
Severity: major → enhancement
Priority: P3 → P5
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Our proxy server was not 1.1 compliant, but it did have what I think is the same
feature:
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/proxy/adminux/cache.htm#1033017
QA Contact: tever → httpqa
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
-> default owner
Assignee: darin → nobody
Component: Networking: HTTP → Networking
QA Contact: networking.http → networking
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
honza, do you want to change the expiration policy for heuristic objects based on this? If not - wontfix please.
Flags: needinfo?(honzab.moz)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2-] [nsbeta3-] → [NEED INFO]1d [nsbeta2-] [nsbeta3-][necko-would-take]
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Patrick McManus [:mcmanus] from comment #19)
> honza, do you want to change the expiration policy for heuristic objects
> based on this? If not - wontfix please.
I was thinking about an optimization like this myself once. I'm a bit afraid we tho break periodically updating pages that don't want/can't provide expiration time. I don't have any heuristic algorithm in my mind right now.
Also, the motivation for this 16 years old bug is to save some satellite connection lags. I think these days this may have improved?
For now WONTFIXing. To revive, let's rather open a new bug and reassess any need for this.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(honzab.moz)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•