Closed
Bug 269280
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
BeOS needs moz-icon implementation
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: simontaylor2, Assigned: simontaylor2)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.8.1)
Attachments
(5 files, 18 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
(deleted),
patch
|
mconnor
:
review+
benjamin
:
approval-branch-1.8.1+
benjamin
:
approval1.8.0.1-
dveditz
:
approval1.8.0.2-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Mozilla and Firefox have started using moz-icon:// urls in order to get the icon
the underlying OS would use for the file. This should be added to BeOS.
At the moment, confusing "External handler" messages pop up whenever a file is
downloaded or the downloads window is opened.
BeOS has a nifty function
GetIconForType(const char *file_type, BBitmap *icon, icon_size which)
which should do the business.
GTK implementation here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225148
Current Status:
I have an implementation (very basic) to get an icon. The code does get called,
and the native BBitmap is correct. However I can't work out how to pass that
back to mozilla - the windows implementation seems to stuff a windows-native
icon into a stream somewhere, the GTK one saves it as a temporary png file and
passes that somewhere else - I want to avoid that approach if possible.
Surely there's a better way? The simple format suggested in the IconDecoder
seems great, but how can I make a bitmap in that format get decoded?
Any help appreciated - pavlov?
Simon
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
the icon channel needs to make nsIStreamListener callbacks on the passed-in
listener to asyncOpen, with the appropriate data in ondataavailable's stream.
windows uses an inputstreampump for this, which probably simplifies your code.
note that these callbacks should happen asynchronously (nsIInputStreamPump
ensures that)
if you want to use nsIconDecoder.cpp your channel's content type should be
image/icon
Sorry about the late response, just got back from skiing.
Hoping to catch up with everything in the near future, then I'll upload what
I've done so far. Basically it is just a copy from the gnome bug, with the
actual icon-getting code stripped out and replaced with a skeletal implementation.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
<sadness_and_flame mode=ON>
Ohh, tons of such mess
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=148530
only for little bit of IMHO useless "coolness":(
Coolness == straight way to bloatware
<sadness_and_flame mode=OFF>
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
If you look at the patch closely, the largest part of it consists of modifying
the build system and the license headers. The actual code is quite small. I
wouldn't call it bloatware at this point (though I guess you should draw a line
between what platform dependent additions are usefull, and which are just
playful crap). I think in this case it might even be a good addition. Else,
Firefox would just have to have its own database of icons, which is something I
would consider bloatware.
As Niels says, most of the patch is to do with adding files to the build. The
actual file addition itself is quite small (and will be much simpler that the
gnome implementation anyway).
I have a little more free time now, I'll try and get this basically working this
weekend.
I've been having huge difficulty creating a patch that works for files in
different directories, so I'm afraid there will be lots of attachments on the
way. I've been fighting with diff far too long now though, and I know some
people want to see the code, so I thought it was best to do it this way.
Firstly I'll upload the necessary files for the beos moz-icon implementation -
the changes to the build system and the implementation itself.
That's 6 files worth I'm afraid...
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Create a "beos" dir in mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/ and drop this in
it
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
This is just a patch for configure. I think the idea is to alter configure.in,
then re-run autoconf. For that reason configure.in is included in the first
patch in this bug.
However I don't think autoconf works correctly on beos, so as a temporary
solution this patch will modify the configure script directly. Run it from
mozilla/
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
The firefox download manager only asks for icons on windows. This alters the
ifdefs so they are requested on BeOS too.
This might belong in another bug, but I'll put it here for now.
Apply this one in mozilla/toolkit/mozapps/downloads/content/
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
I've opened a new bug for the download manager in ff generating the wrong
moz-icon:// strings - that is bug 280944
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
From the description of moz-icon, if a direct reference to a local file is
required it should be:
"moz-icon://file://path/to/file.ext"
However nsIconURI.cpp doesn't look for the first // (eg expects
"moz-icon:file://"), so local files never get parsed correctly.
This one gets applied in mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon
That concludes all my files...sorry for the mass of emails!
Attachment #173280 -
Attachment is patch: true
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 173295 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix nsIconURI to parse file:// URIs correctly
this is already being patched in bug 233461 comment 40, which already has
reiew...
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 173295 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix nsIconURI to parse file:// URIs correctly
(In reply to comment #19)
> (From update of attachment 173295 [details] [diff] [review] [edit])
> this is already being patched in bug 233461 comment 40, which already has
> reiew...
OK, obseleting my patch.
About the rest of the implementation: It is an exact copy of the windows
version besides GetContentType being changed to return "image/icon" and
MakeInputStream being written with the BeOS-specific stuff. Hopefully that
should make it easier to get review.
I expect 1 patch would be much easier to get into the tree though, but "cvs
diff -up4N Makefile.in Configure.in modules/libpr0n/decoders/Makefile.in [etc]"
produced a patch that didn't work ("patch -i patchfile" tried to apply
everything in the root mozilla directory.)
Attachment #173295 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
> ("patch -i patchfile" tried to apply everything in the root mozilla directory.)
you also need -p0 as an option to patch
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the comments above. Now it is in one patch - apply in mozilla/ with
"patch -p0 < patchfile" or similar.
There are a few changes too - MakeInputStream has been cleaned up a little, and
error checking restructured to better fit mozilla's coding guidelines. Also if
the local file exists but has not yet been identified by Tracker, we force an
identify and get the MIME type from beos, as that is more accurate (it seems
mozilla's mime service doesn't know things like .mpg)
Attachment #173271 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #173272 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #173273 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #173274 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #173277 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #173278 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
I'm having a weird issue with this patch (although I don't think it's the patch
itself). The makefile in decoders don't work for me. The lines
ifeq ($(OS_ARCH),BeOS)
DIRS = icon/beos icon
endif
don't cause make to go into icon at all. If I move DIRS out of the ifeq it works
though. I wonder if it's just my computer, the improved build-system or this
bug. I'm a bit worried that OS_ARCH is not ok currently (for BeOS at least).
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
I had exactly the same thing - took me ages to figure it out...
The patch modifies configure.in, but not configure itself. It seems the build
system doesn't automatically run autoconf to create a new configure file (ad
autoconf doesn't work for me anyway). However, I'm sure the idea of
configure.in is that you just modifty that, and let someone run autoconf when
you check it in (that's what the gnome bug does anyway).
If yo apply the patch called "temporary - just for configure", and do a new
build it should pick up the changes.
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
I had exactly the same thing - took me ages to figure it out...
The patch modifies configure.in, but not configure itself. It seems the build
system doesn't automatically run autoconf to create a new configure file (and
autoconf doesn't work for me anyway). However, I'm sure the idea of
configure.in is that you just modifty that, and let someone run autoconf when
they check it in (that's what the gnome bug does anyway).
If you apply the patch called "temporary - just for configure", and do a new
build it should pick up the changes.
Comment 26•20 years ago
|
||
I've noticed this issue as well, because in my latest build, with the patch
applied, I still get warnings about a missing moz_icon protocol.
Comment 27•20 years ago
|
||
Our messages crossed (apparantly). I'll try the configure patch.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: pavlov → simontaylor2
Comment 28•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #25)
> let someone run autoconf when
> they check it in (that's what the gnome bug does anyway).
autoconf is run automatically when a change to configure.in gets checked in.
(note that when you run autoconf yourself, you need version 2.13 - 2.5x won't work)
Comment 29•19 years ago
|
||
The changes here seem to work. What other efforts are required to get this into
CVS?
Comment 30•19 years ago
|
||
the patch needs review. and if it wants to land before the 1.8 branch is made,
it needs approval too (once it has review).
Comment 31•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #27)
> Our messages crossed (apparantly). I'll try the configure patch.
Neilx, did you ever have a chance to configure the patch appropriately? This
implementation has been working here for quite a while. I'm concerned that the
patch file is getting stale and wonder if an updated patch would allow us to
request review.
Comment 32•19 years ago
|
||
no substantive changes, just a more current patch that's easier to apply.
Comment 33•19 years ago
|
||
Let's get this thing ready for take-off. Only one issue that needs to be solved
(I think). When Firefox is restarted, the old items in the download window have
a single (boring) icon. We need to find out why and how this happens, before
landing this patch. Plus, configure.in needs to be updated (the patch currently
fails).
Comment 34•19 years ago
|
||
It seems that the issue of icons mis-appearing when Firefox is started and there
are old downloads in the download window, are an issue named in bug 280944 .
This means that this patch will go into the second round of pre-review. As Simon
is no longer able to do this himself, I will take over and make sure this patch
will land well before the release of Firefox 1.5.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 35•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #173280 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 36•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #173691 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #196403 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 37•19 years ago
|
||
seems difficult to keep the patch files fresh... I'm having trouble applying to
2005-09-29 CVS.
Comment 38•19 years ago
|
||
Depend on bug 280944, because frankly it is required to fix this one if we want to have a good moz_icon support.
Depends on: 280944
Comment 39•19 years ago
|
||
configure.in was changed recently, in the area that invokes these BeOS changes. This patch adds beos to the list of OS with icon support, in the new configure.in file.
Comment 40•19 years ago
|
||
After configure.in is read and /mozilla/configure exists, apply this patch to enable testing. This patch and its companion obsolete the patches from 2005-09-18. Patches should be applied in the /mozilla directory, not in subdirectories.
Since we've been successfully using this code for almost a year (successfully), I'm requesting a review - not sure who needs to look at this, but I'll start with biesi. I hope this is OK.
Attachment #204655 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #204654 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 41•19 years ago
|
||
Doug, this page is good to know who to ask: http://www.mozilla.org/owners.html
Comment 42•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 204655 [details] [diff] [review]
Testing: apply this after mozIconBeOS.patch
this one should not be checked in
Attachment #204655 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 43•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 204654 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch to work with recent changes to configure.in
+ nsCOMPtr<nsIMozIconURI> iconURI (do_QueryInterface(mUrl, &rv));
maybe mUrl should be of type nsIMozIconURI and the QI done in Init
+ if(desiredImageSize > 16)
+ iconSize = 32;
wrong indentation on the second line here
+ PRUint32 iconLength = 2 + iconSize*(iconSize*3 + alphaBytesPerRow);
can you add a comment where these numbers come from?
more later...
Comment 44•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 204654 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch to work with recent changes to configure.in
why is nativeIcon allocated on the heap rather than the stack? and, aren't you leaking it?
Comment 45•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 204654 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch to work with recent changes to configure.in
+ BBitmap* nativeIcon = new BBitmap(BRect(0,0,iconSize - 1,iconSize - 1), B_CMAP8);
can you be a bit more consistent with spaces after commas?
+ if(localNode.ReadAttr("BEOS:TYPE", B_STRING_TYPE, 0, NULL, 0) != B_OK)
+ update_mime_info(filePath.get(), 0, 1, 1);
Couldn't you avoid the if and just always call update_mime_info with force=false?
I'm noticing that you're inconsistent with whether there's a space after the if and before the opening paren, please decide on one style and use it :)
+ if(!gotBitmap)
+ return NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE;
wrong indentation
more later...
Comment 46•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 204654 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch to work with recent changes to configure.in
I think it'd be better to move the iconLength declaration here:
+ uint8 *buffer = new uint8[iconLength];
Comment 47•19 years ago
|
||
Biesi, thank you for the review. I'll correct what I can (especially formatting/spacing) I wish Simon was still participating, as I don't understand the structure of the code well enough to answer your questions in comments 44 and 46.
Comment 48•19 years ago
|
||
Looks like it is really leaking.
Doug,
replace
BBitmap* nativeIcon = new BBitmap(BRect(0,0,iconSize - 1,iconSize - 1), B_CMAP8);
with
BBitmap nativeIcon(BRect(0,0,iconSize - 1,iconSize - 1), B_CMAP8);
replace
if (!nativeIcon)
with
if (!nativeIcon.IsValid())
and replace all remaining occurencies of
nativeIcon
with
&nativeIcon
and see if it works
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #204655 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #204654 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #204654 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 49•19 years ago
|
||
I think this gets us closer.
Comment 50•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #205597 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 51•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 205599 [details] [diff] [review]
really corrected spacing, etc, per biesi and fixed leak per fyysik
found problems with patch file. will upload revised patch after testing.
Attachment #205599 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 52•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 53•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 205676 [details] [diff] [review]
cleaned spacing, fixed leak, applied against clean tree and tested OK here.
(this patch doesn't seem to address some of the previous comments. some new comments follow)
+ PRUint32 iconLength = 2 + iconSize*(iconSize*3 + alphaBytesPerRow);
You should be consistent with spacing around operators...
+ else
+ {
+ destByte += 3;
+ }
hm... uninitialized bytes... I think it'd be better to initialize this to black or something.
+ if (iconCol < iconSize - 1)
I don't really get the point of these ifs... when the condition is false, the variables are reset anyway, right?
r=biesi with all my comments addressed
Attachment #205676 -
Flags: review+
Comment 54•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #53)
> (From update of attachment 205676 [details] [diff] [review] [edit])
> (this patch doesn't seem to address some of the previous comments. some new
> comments follow)
>
> + PRUint32 iconLength = 2 + iconSize*(iconSize*3 + alphaBytesPerRow);
>
> You should be consistent with spacing around operators...
>
Biesi, what is considered "best practice"? In looking through, I see the code consistently puts spaces around "+" while omitting them around "*" operators. I'll happily change this to whatever is considered "correct".
> + else
> + {
> + destByte += 3;
> + }
>
> hm... uninitialized bytes... I think it'd be better to initialize this to black
> or something.
>
stupid noob question: where/how would this be initialized?
> + if (iconCol < iconSize - 1)
>
> I don't really get the point of these ifs... when the condition is false, the
> variables are reset anyway, right?
>
Do you think they can simply be eliminated?
> r=biesi with all my comments addressed
>
I'll do my best. Please bear in mind, this patch has been cooking for almost 3 years and the original author seems to have left the BeOS community. I'm doing what I can to keep it fresh but don't have much insight into the code itself, as I'm really more a build tester than a true dev. I really appreciate your help on this. Seems like we're very close here and apologize for all the iterations.
Comment 55•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #53)
> + PRUint32 iconLength = 2 + iconSize*(iconSize*3 + alphaBytesPerRow);
>
fixed - will be in next revision of patch
>
> + if (iconCol < iconSize - 1)
>
> I don't really get the point of these ifs... when the condition is false, the
> variables are reset anyway, right?
I don't know Simon's original reason for including them. I created a version without the conditional but with the operations that follow and it seems to work well for BeOS purposes (displaying icons in download window and download destination of prefs panel). If Simon is still around, maybe he can remember why he included these if statements. Otherwise, my testing has shown no trouble bypassing them.
Comment 56•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #54)
> Biesi, what is considered "best practice"? In looking through, I see the code
> consistently puts spaces around "+" while omitting them around "*" operators.
> I'll happily change this to whatever is considered "correct".
Oh :-/ Well, I think that's not such a good idea. Most Mozilla code uses spaces around all operators (except stuff like ->). But making this file internally inconsistent is probably not a good idea... so, I guess best to follow the file style (or to convert the file completely)
> stupid noob question: where/how would this be initialized?
Just something like:
*destByte++ = 0;
*destByte++ = 0;
*destByte++ = 0;
At the same place where currently the pointer is just incremented.
> Do you think they can simply be eliminated?
Yes, I think they can just be replaced with the if body.
> I'll do my best. Please bear in mind, this patch has been cooking for almost 3
> years and the original author seems to have left the BeOS community.
I'm sorry about that. This bug seems to have had the patch only for a year, but that's a long time too... It seems to me that review should've been requested earlier...
Comment 57•19 years ago
|
||
Addressed Biesi's addtional comments. Spacing around operands is consistent and according to convention. Uninitialized bytes now initialized. Removed conditionals (but left comment in case unforseen problems arise in the future).
Biesi, please take a look. If it looks good to you, is an SR required? (I'd assume yes, as toolkit/components/downloads/src/nsDownloadManager.cpp is changed along with libpr0n.)
Attachment #205676 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #209065 -
Flags: review?
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #209065 -
Flags: review? → review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 58•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209065 [details] [diff] [review]
addressed Biesi's additional comments
can you attach a patch with the usual diff flags? (something like -Nu7p)
Attachment #209065 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 59•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #58)
> (From update of attachment 209065 [details] [diff] [review] [edit])
> can you attach a patch with the usual diff flags? (something like -Nu7p)
>
I can try - but I don't know how to force cvs diff to create patch entries for files that aren't in CVS. To create this, I first created a patch for all the files in the repository using CVS diff, then manually appended a patch created by a local "diff" against /dev/null.
I'm sure there's a better way - please let me know.
Comment 60•19 years ago
|
||
those diff flags work with the standalone diff program too, but there is indeed a better way: If you have CVS access, use "cvs add"; otherwise use http://viper.haque.net/~timeless/redbean/
(doesn't work though if the files are in a new directory, because that actually creates the dir on the server immediately)
Comment 61•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #209065 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #209144 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Comment 62•19 years ago
|
||
if ((bitNo%8)==0)
spacing around operators?
I'd be happier if you didn't add that comment, or at least comment it out with #if 0, or use a more common commenting out style (that is, one of:
// line 1
// line 2
and
/*
* line 1
* line 2
*/
)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #209144 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger) → review+
Comment 63•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #62)
> if ((bitNo%8)==0)
>
> spacing around operators?
>
Rats! Caught me again.
> I'd be happier if you didn't add that comment, or at least comment it out with
> #if 0, or use a more common commenting out style (that is, one of:
> // line 1
> // line 2
> and
> /*
> * line 1
> * line 2
> */
> )
>
Will do.
Comment 64•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #209144 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 65•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #209153 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 66•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209158 [details] [diff] [review]
reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
requesting toolkit peer review, as this changes download.xml.
Attachment #209158 -
Attachment description: reformatted comments → reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: review?(bryner)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: review?(bryner) → review?(mconnor)
Comment 67•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209158 [details] [diff] [review]
reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
r=me on the toolkit parts
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: review?(mconnor) → review+
Comment 68•19 years ago
|
||
thanks, biesi and mconnor! Biesi, if I understand, this needs no further review. I do not have the ability to commit changes. Is there some place I can request help to commit these changes? Please advise. g
Comment 69•19 years ago
|
||
checked in on trunk! if you want this in firefox 2 / seamonkey 1.1, you need to request 1.8 approval.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 70•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209158 [details] [diff] [review]
reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
requesting this change be incorporated in 1.8.
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.1?
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.2?
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.1?
Comment 71•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209158 [details] [diff] [review]
reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
1.8.0.1 is already out the door. This doesn't really fit the 1.8.0 branch criteria (being neither a regression or a stability issue).
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.1? → approval1.8.0.1-
Comment 72•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #71)
> ...This doesn't really fit the 1.8.0 branch
> criteria (being neither a regression or a stability issue).
My apologies if not fitting for this release. It's been hanging over our heads, implemented as patches in BeOS builds for so long, it just seems like it belongs. Thank you for the review.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.1? → branch-1.8.1+
Comment 73•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 74•19 years ago
|
||
checked in on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH, but I'm not 100% sure I merged this correctly, please verify
Checking in allmakefiles.sh;
/cvsroot/mozilla/allmakefiles.sh,v <-- allmakefiles.sh
new revision: 1.579.2.8; previous revision: 1.579.2.7
done
Checking in configure;
/cvsroot/mozilla/configure,v <-- configure
new revision: 1.1492.2.29; previous revision: 1.1492.2.28
done
Checking in configure.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/configure.in,v <-- configure.in
new revision: 1.1503.2.25; previous revision: 1.1503.2.24
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/Makefile.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in
new revision: 1.13.18.1; previous revision: 1.13
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/Makefile.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in
new revision: 1.17.8.1; previous revision: 1.17
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/nsIconModule.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/nsIconModule.cpp,v <-- nsIconModule.cpp
new revision: 1.7.12.1; previous revision: 1.7
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/Makefile.in;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/Makefile.in,v <-- Makefile.in
new revision: 1.1.2.2; previous revision: 1.1.2.1
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/nsIconChannel.cpp;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/nsIconChannel.cpp,v <-- nsIconChannel.cpp
new revision: 1.1.2.2; previous revision: 1.1.2.1
done
Checking in modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/nsIconChannel.h;
/cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/decoders/icon/beos/nsIconChannel.h,v <-- nsIconChannel.h
new revision: 1.1.2.2; previous revision: 1.1.2.1
done
Checking in toolkit/mozapps/downloads/content/download.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/toolkit/mozapps/downloads/content/download.xml,v <-- download.xml
new revision: 1.20.2.1; previous revision: 1.20
done
Keywords: fixed1.8.1
Hardware: Other → PC
Comment 75•19 years ago
|
||
I think we need some effective cache for types/icons, instead regetting it everytime from system.
I'm very unsatisfied with SeaMonkey download manager behaviour after icon support appeared there.
Comment 76•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 209158 [details] [diff] [review]
reformatted comments. hopefully clean now.
out of scope for security/stability updates
Attachment #209158 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.2? → approval1.8.0.2-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•