Closed
Bug 276330
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
BeOS does not need the extra seeking introduced by bug 4090
Categories
(NSPR :: NSPR, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
4.6
People
(Reporter: thesuckiestemail, Assigned: thesuckiestemail)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
wtc
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041219 Firefox/1.0
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041219 Firefox/1.0
From bug 4090:
'PR_Open() has a flag "PR_APPEND" which the document claims
will open the file with the offset at the end of the file.
This is not currently implemented on Win32.'
UNIX and BeOS should do the right thing without that patch.
Reproducible: Always
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: wtchang → thesuckiestemail
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Patch looks good. I'll try to apply it later. If it applies cleanly in the MAIN
branch, you should find someone to review it. I know whom to contact for a
superreview.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
1. Did you test the patch? does it work? How can you test whether it works or not?
2. What extra value does it give? Is it a worthwhile performance patch?
(not to discourage you, but I think the ifdefs are rather ugly. At the other
hand, they're there anyway, so that's not an issue either).
Finally, one stylistic remark: In the first hunk
mozilla/nsprpub/pr/src/io/prfile.c the #endif is marked with XP_UNIX in a
comment. You should mention XP_BEOS there as well.
1. I've applied it and it runs ok. I havn't looked at any log-file to see it in
action. But we're using the exact same function for opening with APPEND and
BeBook says the same so I've read up how it should work in a perfect work. I
have never heard from any other project or port using POSIX to have problem with
APPEND so I'm quite confident it's ok. I should at least expect Apache to have
it in it's code. Anyone has an easy way to check this? A log-file generated
while running firefox perhaps?
2. It removes unnecessary code, always strive for perfection. Also I wanted to
get it of my mind and down in a bug instead as I'm moving from AVIARY to trunk.
Notice that the bug is set to minor as it is just 'the right way' for BeOS, but
doesn't really change much. You should read the defines as 'if windows or OS/2
or other platform without append'.
(Btw, you missed the double space in the first hunk :P)
Btw, don't worry about discouraging me. I appreciate comments. Ifdefs are by
nature a bit ugly, but needed in many many places. I think it would be uglier
for us to have code that just adds bloat though.
Added XP_BEOS endif comment, and asking for review.
Attachment #169805 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #171437 -
Flags: review?(sergei_d)
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171437 [details] [diff] [review]
added the XP_BEOS comment.
r=sergei_d
For nicety, person who will check that in, should remove extra space before ||
in last #if
:)
Attachment #171437 -
Flags: review?(sergei_d) → review+
Same patch but with the extra space removed.
Attachment #171437 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171518 [details] [diff] [review]
Removed extra space
Ran the nspr test 'append -d' and it passed so I guess it's time for sr (and
checkin would be nice too)
Attachment #171518 -
Flags: superreview?(wtchang)
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171518 [details] [diff] [review]
Removed extra space
tqh, thanks for the patch.
I want to ask you to make a change, and I
apologize for forgetting to ask you to do
it before.
In your patch, please replace all instances of
#if !(defined(XP_UNIX) || defined(XP_BEOS))
by
#if !defined(_PR_HAVE_O_APPEND)
and add
#define _PR_HAVE_O_APPEND
to nsprpub/pr/include/md/_unixos.h and _beos.h.
This will make it easier to do this for another
platform if it also has O_APPEND or an equivalent.
Attachment #171518 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #171518 -
Flags: superreview?(wtchang) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Will do.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Added reference to this bug in comment and also tried to describe the define in
the md headers.
Can't test the UNIX change, but BeOS is ok.
Attachment #171547 -
Flags: superreview?(wtchang)
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Patch checked in on the NSPR tip (NSPR 4.6)
and NSPR_PRE_4_2_CLIENT_BRANCH (Mozilla 1.8 Beta).
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 4.6
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171547 [details] [diff] [review]
_PR_HAVE_O_APPEND with comments (checked in after editing)
r=wtc. I made some editing changes before
checking this in.
Attachment #171547 -
Attachment description: _PR_HAVE_O_APPEND with comments → _PR_HAVE_O_APPEND with comments (checked in after editing)
Attachment #171547 -
Flags: superreview?(wtchang) → superreview+
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
I ran "append -d" with the "WIN95" configuration
of NSPR on Windows. The test passed.
Most Unix platforms do not use the code in prfile.c.
(Their file functions are implemented in ptio.c.)
So I didn't test the patch on Unix.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•