Closed
Bug 279589
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Documentation suggests ISO-8859-1 encoding, but template files are UTF-8
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect, P3)
Bugzilla
Documentation
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: emmanuel, Assigned: Wurblzap)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
cso
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0 The Bugzilla documentation recommends the English speakers to enforce the use of ISO-8859-1 as the default charset by editing Bugzilla/CGI.pm yet the template files in Bugzilla 2.18 are encoded in UTF-8. Is the documentation up to date ? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.18/html/security-bugzilla.htm 2. Read page content 3. Expected Results: All users should be recommended to use UTF-8 as default charset.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126266 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
This is not a dupe. It's a question relating to the accuracy of the documentation, not the code. It's worthy of remaining open so we can at least clarify what the issues are with UTF-8 encoding within the documentation. Dependency set so we can keep track of progress on UTF-8.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Changing summary to more accurately reflect the underlying issue.
Summary: should utf-8 be enforced as default charset ? → Documentation suggests ISO-8859-1 encoding, but template files are UTF-8
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Yeah, we should suggest UTF-8 instead of ISO-8859-1 in the docs. We can't do it in the code without breaking people that are upgrading, but if they want to do it on their own, it should be UTF-8. Especially since we're coding the templates that way. I don't think this has any dependency on bug 126266 to fix the docs though.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 185145 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for HEAD and branch r=me by inspection, although I'm not sure on the wording of the first bit.
Attachment #185145 -
Flags: review? → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Severity: minor → trivial
Whiteboard: [patch awaiting checkin] [patch awaiting checkin 2.18]
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in docs/xml/security.xml; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/security.xml,v <-- security.xml new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 done Checking in docs/xml/security.xml; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/security.xml,v <-- security.xml new revision: 1.2.2.3; previous revision: 1.2.2.2 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Priority: -- → P3
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [patch awaiting checkin] [patch awaiting checkin 2.18]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•