User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050223 Firefox/1.0.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050223 Firefox/1.0.1 Firefox seems to consume all of my CPU when flash content is displayed. I have the most recent version of Flash plug-in installed, plugin version 7.0 r24 . My powerbook is a 1.25 Ghz G4 with 768MB of RAM and shouldn't be having these problems. I'm going to have to switch back to Safari, because I keep losing my work when I have to force quit firefox. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE fix this problem. It has plagued Firefox since it's inception and it's totally ruining the experience for me... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to www.drudgereport.com and wait for it to pop-up an ad window with flash content. 2. Go to friendster.com and have one of their banners consumer 95% of CPU. 3. Actual Results: The activity monitor in Mac OS X shows Firefox consuming 95%-100% of the CPU. Expected Results: It shouldn't do that.

wfm. Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; ja-JP; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050311 Firefox/1.0+

Dup of bug 285275?

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050312 Firefox/1.0+ WFM Reporter, could you please try a newer build.

I see the same thing happenning with FireFox 1.0.6. After visiting http://www.timewatch.org/ firefox-bin uses more than 95% of the CPU constantly. FireFox has AdBlock installed but I can't get far enough to block the Flash app causing the problem. My system is an Athlon 2200 with Linux version 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 (bhcompile@tweety.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)) #1 Fri Jul 15 00:52:32 EDT 2005.

Can I change this to: Status: Confirmed Hardware: All OS: All ???

Appens here: http://applications.linux.com/applications/05/08/25/1524240.shtml?tid=13 with: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-PT; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050717 Firefox/1.0.6

(In reply to comment #2) > Dup of bug 285275? Yes I think so. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 285275 ***

v BTW, reporters, have any of you tried FF 1.5 beta yet?

actually i am on beta 2 and this problem is there (285275 still has to be fixed or improved someway)

Still in final of 1.5.