Per bug 247024 comment 12 filing a separate bug so the issue can be tracked separately. See RFC 3023 section 8.4 for the reason why we should avoid text/xml. I'm going to attach a patch that replaces text/xml with application/xml. Can someone tell me whether that is a good thing or not and from who I should get review? Thanks.

> RFC 3023 section 8.4 ? http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.html#sec-8.4

That link doesn't work, but I should've said 8.5. Sorry about that. Anyway, I'm no longer driving this patch.

Comment on attachment 177368 [details] [diff] [review] patch #1 I don't think RFC 3023 section 8.5 is a good reason to avoid text/xml. It just says that if the documents *omits* the charset in the XML declaration, then it needs to be treated as ASCII. That is a good reason to add a charset to the declaration, not to avoid text/xml. WONTFIX.

filesList.js, function createListingFile()

This bug is filed in a bugzilla component related to pre-Firefox code which no longer exists. I believe it is no longer relevant and I am therefore closing it INCOMPLETE. If you believe that this bug is still valid and needs to be fixed, please reopen it and move it to the Toolkit:Startup and Profile System product/component.