User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 This css-construction is not supported by Firefox: h1 { list-style-type: decimal; display: list-item; list-style-position:inside } <h1>HeadA</h1> <h1>HeadB</h1> <h1>HeadC</h1> Reproducible: Always Actual Results: HeadA HeadB HeadC Expected Results: 1. HeadA 2. HeadB 3. HeadC

Btw, if there is a generic workaround for this that works in most broswers (Mozilla, KHTML/Safari and WinIE), please let me know. Currently only Opera 7+ supports autonumbering.

Reporter, in CSS 2.1 list-style-type only applies to OL and UL. About auto-numbering : <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#counters>

bug 3247?

(In reply to comment #2) > Reporter, in CSS 2.1 list-style-type only applies to OL and UL. No, it applies to elements with display:list-item. However, we need a minimal testcase and someone testing this with a recent nightly to make sure it is really a bug and not a duplicate of the bug mentioned in comment 3.

With latest trunk the output is: 0. HeadA 0. HeadB 0. HeadC

Not sure what the new CSS 2.1 specification says about this. Ian?

Duplicate of bug 4522?

In the testcase they have a display:block parent, namely the BODY element. Also, the second testcase in that bug worksforme in a recent build of Firefox and the first is incorrect per the unpublished CSS2.1 WD I believe. (Talking about the non-obsolete testcases here.)

> Not sure what the new CSS 2.1 specification says about this. Ian? dbaron is the counter man. I've completely lost all understanding of how counters work at the moment. Now, questions on margin collapsing, on the other hand...

This has nothing to do with counters. I also don't know what the question is.

What should happen when you have an element foo, that occurs multiple times in a document (as siblings) with the following style rule applied: foo{ list-style-type: decimal; display: list-item; }

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4522 ***