User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050531 Firefox/1.0+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050531 Firefox/1.0+ color-interpolation="linearRGB" renders the same as color-interpolation="sRGB" on the linear gradient in the test suite. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20030813/htmlframe/full-painting-render-01-b.html with Deer Park Alpha 1.1 2. Compare the three gradients. 3. The differences are described in the text on the page. Actual Results: The three examples look the same. Expected Results: The third example should be different (read the text in the test).

Spec. link: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html#ColorInterpolationProperties

Unfortunately, cairo does not support multiple color spaces, so at this point, we're pretty much stuck with what we've got, unless I'm missing something. When cairo does provide the support, we can provide the SVG support.

converting sRGB to linearRGB is a simple gamma correction, it can be expressed as an svg filter ( which allready works in mozilla ! yay :-) ): <filter id="toLinearRGB" filterUnits="objectBoundingBox" x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1"> <feComponentTransfer color-interpolation-filters="sRGB"> <feFuncR type="gamma" amplitude="1" exponent="0.416666666666" offset="0"/> <feFuncG type="gamma" amplitude="1" exponent="0.416666666666" offset="0"/> <feFuncB type="gamma" amplitude="1" exponent="0.416666666666" offset="0"/> <feFuncA type="gamma" amplitude="1" exponent="0.416666666666" offset="0"/> </feComponentTransfer> </filter> here is the site where i found this information: http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/index.php?article=gamma this can be used as a workaround if you need linearRGB.

oops, this is not 100% correct, it should be exponent="0.454545454545" , sorry !

Not sure what the procedure is to mark a CSS feature in MDN as "not implemented yet", so I'm dropping a note here that this feature should be marked in MDN as "not implemented yet" :) (Personally, I find this feature very interesting for producing very natural-looking colour blending, possibly with a view to HDR colour in the browser. In conjunction with bloom/blur/spread/convolution filters, very lush appearances can be achieved.)

(In reply to Martin Funcich from comment #6) > Not sure what the procedure is to mark a CSS feature in MDN as "not > implemented yet", so I'm dropping a note here that this feature should be > marked in MDN as "not implemented yet" :) > > (Personally, I find this feature very interesting for producing very > natural-looking colour blending, possibly with a view to HDR colour in the > browser. In conjunction with bloom/blur/spread/convolution filters, very > lush appearances can be achieved.) Oooh, just noticed there is a color-interpolation-filters property for SVG filters that defaults to linearRGB and appears to be already working ... nice ...

(In reply to Martin Funcich from comment #6) > Not sure what the procedure is to mark a CSS feature in MDN as "not > implemented yet", so I'm dropping a note here that this feature should be > marked in MDN as "not implemented yet" :) > It is implemented for mask elements though, but not elsewhere.