Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky] Reporter
	Description • 19 years ago

The last patch in bug 296639 restores principals on the outer window.  It seems
to me that any time we get principals on the outer window that's a bug -- the
inner window is the one that has semi-immutable principals associated with the
document; the outer window doesn't...

	Johnny Stenback (:jst)
	Comment 1 • 19 years ago

Actually, we'll always be calling GetPrincipal() on outer windows from caps when
it's looking for object principals for a window other than the window where the
code is running. I doubt there's much we can do about that. We should never be
using an outer window's principals as the subject principal tho, maybe we should
add some assertions to that effect to caps?

	Brendan Eich [:brendan]
	Comment 2 • 19 years ago

(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually, we'll always be calling GetPrincipal() on outer windows from caps when
> it's looking for object principals for a window other than the window where the
> code is running.

But aren't object principals found via the parent chain?  If we walk up that, we
should only ever get to an inner window.

If some object principals are sought from an outer window (not a contained doc,
form, element, node, etc.), then perhaps the caller should be required to get
and pass the inner window, restoring the invariant that this bug wants.

/be

	Johnny Stenback (:jst)
	Comment 3 • 19 years ago

Imagine you're doing w=window.open(); w.foo="foo";, in that case we'll need to
find the object principals of w when checking if the caller can set w.foo, and w
is an outer window, so we'll get the principals from it. Internally that's of
course equivalent to getting the principals of the current inner, but the call
is made on the outer nonetheless.

	Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky] Reporter
	Comment 4 • 19 years ago

Yeah.  Let's assert in GetSubjectPrincipal (though I'm not sure how, to be
completely truthful) and do some long and hard thinking about how to deal with
GetObjectPrincipal when we go to optimize it.

	Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky] Reporter
	Comment 5 • 19 years ago

This is invalid, per comment 3.