Closed
Bug 31479
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
about:demo
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Help Documentation, enhancement, P3)
SeaMonkey
Help Documentation
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: neil)
References
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
Attachments
(10 files, 1 obsolete file)
what about an about:demo or about:features?
Think advertising - for a 'storefront' - show off all the Mozilla coolness here
for the few and new who want to see what Mozilla is capable of.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
henrik, this is doable but someone needs to write the html/css/js for the page
that you want to load. Maybe you can excercise mozilla's features and post the
sources at which point i could hook it up for you.
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
I think, this is a good idea. <about:feature> could show a summary of "best"
features. <about:feature/-area-> (e.g. <about:feature/mailnews/viewer/html> or
<about:feature/core/chrome/skin>) could list features of a certain area. Until
here, HTML should be sufficient (assuming the protocol handler is hooked up).
Feature "leafs" (feature "primitives") could link to an animated or even
interactive demo. This part is probaly a lot of work.
verah, are you likely to implement at least the first part? If not, can you add
a helpwanted keyword?
OS: Windows 98 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I can't do this at present. I could provide a list of features we
might want to highlight, and some text, if someone else could author this.
Adding the helpwanted keyword.
Keywords: helpwanted
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
spam: mass-moving currently open help bugs to Terri, who now does qa on 'em. :)
QA Contact: paw → tpreston
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Hey, I know -- let's include a Quake clone written in XUL.
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
verah@netscape.com: Can you please upload your list as an attachment
to the bug. I may be interested in working on this.
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
Oh good! I'll create the list/descriptions as soon as possible. Probably Tuesday
12/5. When I've got that I'll reassign to Zach.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
cool. I can't do anything too hard, but I can sure try!
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
Here we go... sorry for the delay; I've been sick as a dog. I'm attaching
documents that sort of outline/describe four "about..." demos that I think would
be good. I'm suggesting the following:
About Mozilla's End User Features (you'd probably want a different title)
About My Sidebar (for developers -- who want to create tabs)
About Themes (for people who want to create themes)
About Standards Support
There may be more possibilities, or better possibilities, but these are the ones
that come to my mind. I've provided some text (and three gifs), but these are
naturally Netscape-centric seeing as how I've been writing Netscape stuff for
the past three years! However, I'm hopeful that the examples will help you write
text appropriate for Mozilla.
You might want to look at the "What's New in Netscape 6" piece, which is a tour
of features. It's not really a demo, in that the reader is not led through a
series of steps and there's nothing animated or anything fancy like that.
Reassigning to Zach. Good luck!
Assignee: verah → zach
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
accepting bug. The first thing that comes to mind for me is how to animate
stuff. I was thinking flash, except I don't have flash and flash doesn't come
with mozilla. I can't export director as shockwave or java applets because
mozilla doesn't come with shockwave or java by standard. This leaves
animated gifs. Does anyone have any better ideas?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
JavaScript and the DOM? That would demonstrate our cool standard support at the
same time for those who care...
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
DUH! Time to play with dreamweaver timelines and make them work in
mozilla.
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
Faking it using Mozilla keywords!
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html
Create a bookmark as normal to whatever it is you want
Then go to bookmark properties
set the keyword to
about:demo
or
about:features
or
about:whateveryoulike
Now if you type about:demo in the location bar mozilla will automagically
follow your link.
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
There isn't much need to fake it with keywords because we can just hook
it right into the browser. The problem is getting the demo site. Once we
have the site ready, hooking it up is no problem. I'm still not sure exactly
when I plan to have this done, but It's higher on my list than before.
Comment 24•22 years ago
|
||
how about bug 170240?
Comment 25•22 years ago
|
||
about:feature would be better served by bug 103608
about:demo might be better served by bug 170240
and some of the stuff mentioned could go into Mozilla Help files
Comment 26•22 years ago
|
||
Graphical version of what demo could be
Comment 27•22 years ago
|
||
how-to-make-a-skin is overkill to be put in the Help files
Attachment #20575 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 28•22 years ago
|
||
What you show is more like a tutorial. I thought a demo where something which
doesn't teach, but just shows some cool things. I guess that would stress the
Gecko renderer, then, rather than the UI. Like that 3D cube (lost the URL),
something like netcenter's news boxes, but implemented on the client side and
with tabs, some cool resizable SVG, a webpage how it *should* look like ;) etc..
Comment 29•22 years ago
|
||
s/where/were
oh, and if you make a tutorial, instead of showing screenshots, why not mark the
real UI elements with a red (blinking?) flame, like the DOM inspector does?
Comment 30•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 31•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 32•22 years ago
|
||
Ben, you are right. Perhaps all the attachments could go into
about:features (or bug 103608, or bug 170240)?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment 33•18 years ago
|
||
about:abandoned? Or is there work still going on on this?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: zach → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → neil
QA Contact: tpreston → danielwang
Comment 34•14 years ago
|
||
Is this really wanted yet? Some features explained in the attachments sample files are not available any longer, others are now common in most browsers...
Comment 35•13 years ago
|
||
It's dead Jim. =>WONTFIX.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•