Closed Bug 330700 (bz-roadmap) Opened 19 years ago Closed 18 years ago

Bugzilla 3.0: Roadmap

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect)

2.23
defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 3.0

People

(Reporter: mkanat, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: meta)

This bug represents, in Bugzilla, the tasks outlined at http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Roadmap. It's here so that we can see in a single dependency tree, overall, how we're doing on our progress toward Bugzilla 3.0.

No dependencies should be added to this bug other than those listed in the Roadmap.

Note that the critical bugs which must be resolved before Bugzilla can be considered 3.0 are:

bug 87406
bug 91037
bug 321556
Alias: bz-roadmap
what is the status about bug 91037 ?
will it be in 2.24 ?
is there a patch for 2.22 ?
Now that nobody is working on Oracle support anymore, I think it's reasonable to remove it from our roadmap (the roadmap on wiki has already been updated). This doesn't mean we won't take it for 3.0 if we are ready on time.
No longer depends on: bz-oracle
Group: webtools-security
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.0 → Bugzilla 2.24
Looks like Firefox did some strange selecting of the group radio boxes on the mass-change page when I clicked refresh in my browser before that last mass-change. This is not really a security bug. :-)
Group: webtools-security
Depends on: 349806
Please do not block this bug with features which have not been discussed and approved during our initial meeting.
No longer depends on: 349806
Depends on: bz-postbugpm
bug 101179 isn't on the roadmap for 3.0 anymore. Nor is bug 325501.
No longer depends on: bz-custstat, ajax
All tasks on our roadmap for 3.0 have been fixed, see http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Roadmap
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I'm confused - the dependency tree doesn't agree.  In fact, if I click on show dependency tree, it only shows this bug as being resolved.  One of the apparently resolved bugs is 87406, however, it doesn't show up in the dependency tree.  Is that my misunderstanding of how the dependency tree should work or is that a bug?
Only open bugs are displayed in the tree by default, explaining why this bug is the only one being marked as fixed at first sight. Then the remaining blockers of this bug involve more new features than the strict set of features we wanted for 3.0.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.