Closed
Bug 331879
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
[BeOS] Build broken in shlibsign of softokn3
Categories
(NSS :: Build, defect, P1)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 301249
3.11.1
People
(Reporter: doug, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
Attachments
(2 files)
(deleted),
text/plain
|
Details | |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060325 Firefox/1.6a1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060325 Firefox/1.6a1
Build broken sometime in the last 24 hours. Suspect bug 301249 checkin as culprit.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. build Firefox
2.
3.
Actual Results:
build breaks (see attachment for console log)
Expected Results:
completed build
Since BeOS tinerboxen are offline at the moment, we undertake builds daily to catch issues like this.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #216425 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → wtchang
Component: Build Config → Build
Product: Core → NSS
QA Contact: build-config → wtchang
Version: Trunk → unspecified
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
I have deja vu feeling about such bustage. But cannot recall details.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have deja vu feeling about such bustage. But cannot recall details.
>
I got the same feeling as soon as I read your comment. I believe it goes back to late December when post-build lib reordering stopped working.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Thank you, fyysik! How could I have forgotten that unlucky Friday the 13th? Please see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323379. Error messages are pretty much identical. I'll try to dig into it later tonight.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
This is a simple regression. Somehow, the patch from bug 323379 was backed out of the current gversion of sign.sh. I applied this against trunk and build is now successful.
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Doug, nothing has been backed out of the trunk (of NSS) for this file.
The tip of the trunk is rev 1.17, which is your patch, checked in by Wan-Teh,
months ago.
What version of this file do you have?
By what cvs tag did you pull it?
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
> Doug, nothing has been backed out of the trunk (of NSS) for this file.
> The tip of the trunk is rev 1.17, which is your patch, checked in by Wan-Teh,
> months ago.
>
> What version of this file do you have?
> By what cvs tag did you pull it?
>
CVS "Entries" shows version 1.16 for this file. CVS Tag is NNSS_3_11_RTM.
To my knowledge, I have not made any specific attempts to pull anything other than the most current. The problem started sometime between 3/26 and 3/27. When I did a "make -f client.mk", somehow version 1.17 was replaced with 1.16.
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
Perhaps a consequence of the fix for bug 301249 ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10)
> Perhaps a consequence of the fix for bug 301249 ?
>
That was my thought when I opened the bug and researched a bit.
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
well, looks like we build NSS 3.11 RTM, while the fix was made later on the branch. maybe we should pull the branch instead?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: wtchang → build
Updated•19 years ago
|
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
There are 3 or 4 bugs that all seem to be duplicates, except that they
report the problem in the context of different products and/or OSes.
This bug is one of those duplicates.
As reported in bug 301249, the tag NSS_3_11_20060331_TAG has been created
as a replacement for NSS_CLIENT_TAG, and IINM, benjamin has modified
client.mk to use the new tag.
BTW, note that in the new scheme, unlike NSS_CLIENT_TAG (which was
freqently changed and moved), NSS_3_11_20060331_TAG will be immutable,
unmoving. When the time comes for a newer tag, a NEW dated tag will
be created, and will be used in client.mk or whereever.
So, is this bug now resolved/fixed?
Assignee: wtchang → nobody
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, I believe this bug can be marked "RESOLVED".
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Priority: -- → P1
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Target Milestone: --- → 3.11.1
Version: unspecified → 3.11
Comment 16•18 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 301249 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•