Simon Bünzli Reporter
	Description • 18 years ago

From bug 344640 comment #8:

> So, is this API really supposed to be used only from javascript context?

AFAICT the alternatives are to either pass the JavaScript objects as source
strings and call them "JSON strings" (which can easily be (un)eval'd from JS
and Python) or to get a whole bunch of APIs which mirror basic JavaScript
object manipulation. Considering that at least a basic API should go into
Firefox 2, it's probably already too late for the latter though.

	Simon Bünzli Reporter
	Comment 1 • 18 years ago

Bug 344640 eventually went the JSON string way, making the API JavaScript independent (see www.json.org for JSON processing code in various languages, including C++ and Python). Resolving this bug therefore as FIXED.

Please file new bugs for further, specific API extensions / enhancements / refinements, should the need arise.