Closed
Bug 371477
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Java 6 incompatible with FF 2.0.0.2 in Vista but was with 2.0.0.1
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 364390
People
(Reporter: nick.noakes, Unassigned)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
Updating to FF 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.1 would not accept the already installed and just out Java 6 version plugin, which had installed fine a few hours ago on 2.0.0.1
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install java 6 on FF 2.0.0.1
2. Update to FF 2.0.0.2
3. FF 2.0.0.2 reports Java 6 incompatible
Actual Results:
Applications requiring Java plugin won't work.
Expected Results:
Java within browser would function
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; cs; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
- I have tried Java test (http://www.javatester.org/version.html) and all works fine for me. I have Windows Vista/Java 6 too.
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
There are two additional reports of this in the mozilla feedback forum. Both of these reports had a en-GB user agent. Reporter: please go about:plugins in the URL bar and paste the Java version that shows there.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Java(TM) Platform SE 6
File name: npoji610.dll
Java Plug-in 1.6.0 for Netscape Navigator (DLL Helper)
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
i guess this is a dupe of Bug 364390
Its not the plugin, its the Java Console as incompatible addobn (because of the max version)
Version: unspecified → 2.0 Branch
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Nick Noakes: you can test the java version also on http://www.javatester.org/version.html
On which sites do you have problems with the java plugin ? Because of your comment #0 "Actual Results:
Applications requiring Java plugin won't work."
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
I believe Tomcat is correct in regards to this being a dupe of Bug 364390
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•