Closed Bug 378531 Opened 18 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Need the ability to select both the verbose mail list (list all entries) AND bcc.

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Address Book, enhancement)

x86
Windows XP
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 163498

People

(Reporter: allison.aa, Unassigned)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3 Build Identifier: version 1.5.0.10 (20070221) Problem: sending an email to some members of a mailing list with bcc. Currently, one can either select the (entire) mailing list by name and bcc from the drop-down (and thus send to everybody), or display all addresses as "To:" It would be preferable if opening the Address Book, selecting a list and then "Write" produced the same drop-down menu as clicking on "To:" Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Do you mean bug 119977?
Shouldn't these <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163498> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389559> belong in one single bug, e. g. "Bcc handling in Address Book", which would include lists? A setting for an address to default to Bcc as soon as there are several addresses included in sending a message might be a nice thing. Presumably, it might be turned into part of electronic address preferences as in vCard etc. standards (<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VCard>).
Assignee: mscott → nobody
I'm not sure if this bug is a duplicate of bug 163498 or bug 119977. Given we haven't had any response from the reporter, I think bug 119977 is probably the closest.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
I'm sorry, but this is probably *not* a duplicate of bug 119977 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119977. What this one is about, is to have some *but not all* members of a mailing list/group bcc. Not just being able to see that it is so (if it is at all possible - if not, that would be a dependency bug I guess).
(In reply to comment #4) > I'm sorry, but this is probably *not* a duplicate of bug 119977 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119977. > > What this one is about, is to have some *but not all* members of a mailing > list/group bcc. Not just being able to see that it is so (if it is at all > possible - if not, that would be a dependency bug I guess). In which case I think it is a duplicate of bug 163498. In any case I think it is highly unclear exactly what this bug is asking for - which is why I'd rather have it closed than open.
Are you positively sure that bug 163498 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163498 is a duplicate of this one? I see no unambiguous or direct mention of TB being able to handle a list or group in address book in such a way that some addresses *in that group* are Bcc: and some only To: or Cc:, which as I understand is what this bug (378531) is about. In bug 163498 I only see mention of setting Bcc for *entire lists or groups*. No mention of different handling of some, but not all addresses in the list/group. My suggestion for handling it would be to have a setting, e. g. "Personal only", "For your eyes only" or some such, for such addresses to default to Bcc, as soon as there are several recipients included when sending a message. Be that via inclusion in a group or list (those would then have to handle such a behaviour) or by manual adding of addresses (probably more iffy).
(In reply to comment #6) > Are you positively sure that bug 163498 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163498 is a duplicate of this one? As module owner, I am saying that this bug is a) unclear in its intentions (and the original reporter hasn't clarified) and b) is close enough to be marked as a duplicate.
OK. I've filed this RFE instead: Bug 485914 - Set Bcc recipient properties in Address Book. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485914 Hope that's clearer. Unless I have an accident, I'll elaborate on it if any questions arise. :)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.