Closed
Bug 378564
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Sorting by 'read' with threaded on doesn't place threads with unread/new mail on top.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, defect)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: simon.splash, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: closeme 2009-08-10)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
Build Identifier: version 2.0.0.0 (20070326)
When selecting 'view->sort by->read' with threaded on, threads that contain unread messages aren't placed on top (/bottom). This only occurs is the first message in the thread IS read.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Mark some messages in old threads as unread
2. Sort by 'read' with threaded on
3. Observe that previously mentioned threads aren't prioritized above threads without unread messages
Expected Results:
It would be logical if threads with unread are placed on top while sorting on 'read'
using IMAP.
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
xref bug 262319.
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
http://www.micropipes.com/code/threadbubble/ extension delivers this capability, as noted in bug 262319. works well
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: Sorting by 'read' with threaded on doesn't place threads with unread on top. → Sorting by 'read' with threaded on doesn't place threads with unread/new mail on top.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: mscott → nobody
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
This is largely or totally fixed with version 3. Simon, does beta 3 work for you? http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/early_releases/
Whiteboard: closeme 2009-08-10
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Closing Incomplete for lack of answers.
Feel free to reopen if you can provide more information.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
This behavior still happens in Thunderbird 24.3.0.
The steps to reproduce are the same as in the description.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•