Closed
Bug 39195
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Displayed page is blank (black): Valid XML/XHTML 1.0 + CSS 2.0
Categories
(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: burnus, Assigned: rickg)
References
()
Details
Hi this is with 2000-May-12-10o'clock I only get a black page: http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~fsi/links.html. This is according to the validator at W3C correct XHTML 1.0 and correct CSS (modulo some warnings). Tobias
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
The problem is the XML part on top of the entry: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> This is valid according to: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126/#docconf
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: asadotzler → rickg
Component: Browser-General → Parser
QA Contact: jelwell → janc
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Change URL (the old one has <!-- ?...? --> now as work-around). Now trying with HTTP and newest snapshot the page is not black, but simply wont be drawn at all. The page should look like this (work-around): http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~fsi/links.html
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Tested with Build # 2000051808 on RH 6.2. Could not reproduce. Tested with original link, not with work around.
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
The page referenced in the URL currently crashes the browser; this is a known issue - bug 34688. Gerv
Depends on: 34688
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39520 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Since Bug 39520 is closed and slightly diffenent I reopen this bug. Problem, still: This page http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~fsi/links-test.html is not beeing displayed with Linux snapshot 2000-05-26-08. I never expirienced the crashes reported in the bug 39520, but it is simply not displayed at all. Using View|Source the <?xml ...?> is displayed in violett (errorous?) The file starts with <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Tobias
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
WORKSFORME on build 2000032305, but NOT on a more recent 2000052908. Also confirmed on 2000052720. All Linux. According to http://validator.w3.org, this is a completely valid document. See: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.physik.fu-berlin.de%2F%7Efsi%2Flinks-test.html Console output: xmlencoding detect- UTF-8 Document: Done (0.207 secs) *** check number of frames in content area Error loading URL http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~fsi/links-test.html
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
I'm not sure what the problem is here. The doctype detection code has been loosened up now to (correctly) determine the doctype. The blank-page phenomenon isn't reproducable on my machine (but I may be out of date -- indicating a layout bug).
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
rickg@netscape.com wrote: > I'm not sure what the problem is here. The doctype detection code has been > loosened up now to (correctly) determine the doctype. I read so, but it still it doesn't work here! > The blank-page phenomenon isn't reproducable on my machine I observed this under Linux with (now) 2000-05-31-8. Still the same problem. And in the xterm (now) the text "Error loading URL http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~fsi/links-test.html" appears. (Somehow I cannot display the source I simply isn't displayed.) > (but I may be out of date -- indicating a layout bug). (I don't get this sentence.)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Tobias: Please wait to retest this stuff until my next landing. My comments (above) meant to imply that it's working in my tree, but has not landed.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
The strictDTD code has landed, and I think this is now fixed.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
Using the snapshot 2000-06-12-01/Linux I still have this problem (snapshots had been broken for a few days) I will retry it after removing ~/.mozilla and/or with the cvs build before I reopen it. (Sidebar doesn't work in this build so it might be also a bug in this build.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Ok using Build 2000-06-14-08 it works (almost) as expected. The minor glitch I still see is that View|Source shows the first line in italic violett/rosa which as far as I know indicates wrong tags. Else everything is fine and I will remove the <!--? ?--> from my real pages and delete the example. (Changed therefore the URL to the `real' files.)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•