Closed
Bug 416302
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
xulwinopen regression from 189ms to 193ms on bldlnx03_fx
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P2)
Core
JavaScript Engine
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
mozilla1.9
People
(Reporter: jag+mozilla, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression)
Seems to have been the patch from bug 365851. All other changes from around that time have been backed out. Note that on the Mac tinderbox there was no winopen regression, and dhtml on the same box went down by ~3ms.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Updated•17 years ago
|
OS: Linux → All
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Alright you poindexters, settle down... I'm going to make Txul super-bad better.
/be
Assignee: general → brendan
Priority: -- → P1
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9beta4
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
sayrer: -chrome file:/builds/tinderbox/Fx-Trunk/Darwin_8.8.4_Depend/mozilla/xpfe/test/winopen.xul
sayrer: make sure you have that file, prints to stdout
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9+
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: tracking1.9+ → blocking1.9+
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
--> P2, sayrer, can you find someone to look at this?
Priority: P1 → P2
Target Milestone: mozilla1.9beta4 → mozilla1.9
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Takin off blocker list for now since we are ok on txul and not sure what is left to do here. We can follow-up in next release.
Flags: tracking1.9+
Flags: blocking1.9-
Flags: blocking1.9+
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
I was hoping to have time for this, but I don't. I suck, but perhaps someone will rule if I give this up.
/be
Assignee: brendan → general
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: tracking1.9+
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
I'm going to go ahead and declare a 2% regression from six years ago, in a test that most certainly has completely different perf characteristics, isn't relevant anymore.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
> I'm going to go ahead and declare a 2% regression from six years ago, in a
> test that most certainly has completely different perf characteristics,
> isn't relevant anymore.
Steady on, tiger!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•