Closed Bug 425298 Opened 17 years ago Closed 12 years ago

ASSERTION: XPConnect is being called on a scope without a 'Components' property!

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: mmokrejs, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: assertion, regression)

Attachments

(2 files)

User-Agent: Opera/9.50 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Build Identifier: Although this is reported several times in bugzilla none of the stacktraces available are similar to mine. I have current cvs HEAD debug build of 'suite'. It has appeared for me in mailer. I have opened and email which was a forward of two attached messages (.eml). I double-clicked one of the attached messages and while closing that window I got the assertion. Stacktrace will follow. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Attached file stacktrace (deleted) —
Attached file stacktrace while quitting mailer (deleted) —
Top-most half overlaps with the previous stacktrace.
Strange, I thought I'd already filed this, but I can't find it again, so I'll move this bug into the correct product.
Assignee: general → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: General → DOM: Level 0
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Mozilla Application Suite → Core
QA Contact: general → general
I'll get someone to look for a regression range for this.
Flags: blocking1.9?
Keywords: regression
Version: unspecified → Trunk
+'ing this pending investigation.
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9+
same as bug 424281 ? (will add a stack to Bug 424281 also)
this regressed due to bug 352791
Blocks: 352791
Affects Thunderbird shutdown as well, see Thunderbird's startup/shutdown noise tracker bug 426946.
Blocks: tb-noise
Taking this off the list. Doesn't seem to actually break anything at this point. Also, if found to be more serious, we can take in a dot release.
Flags: blocking1.9+ → blocking1.9-
David, as per bug 415495 is it now a requirement for controllers to be removed manually? (Prior to bug 352791 it wasn't necessary.)
I didn't know that it was ever unnecessary in the past. It would be nice if it were not needed, though.
Looks similar to bug 324025.
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
So don't remove controllers explicitly? I have a patch to reduce this assertion, it it needless?
Bug 747434 removed the assertion.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: