Specifically, kRDF_child: 6513 #define TREE_PROPERTY_HACK 1 6514 #if defined(TREE_PROPERTY_HACK) 6515 if (! len) { 6516 // Some ever-present membership tests. 6517 mContainmentProperties.Add(kNC_child); 6518 mContainmentProperties.Add(kNC_Folder); 6519 mContainmentProperties.Add(kRDF_child); 6520 } 6521 #endif 6522 The core RDF namespace doesn't have an property called child. I couldn't find any other obvious references to it in the tree just by using lxr.

dmose: could you try chopping it out to see if "anything breaks"? I think only rjc or I would've done something that relied on rdf:child, and my guess is that most of the stuff is done using nc:child now, anyway.

Yeah, I think RDF#Child is merely historical and hopefully not actually used anywhere.

Allright. I'll remove it, and we can just hand tweak any datasources that still rely on it working.

rjc, r=?

r=rjc with pleasure

fix checked in

VERIFIED that the patch was checked in...