Friend is tryin to make his webpage netscape friendly and is becoming very irritable in the process. He used a 3x3 table with pictures and the entire thing at one point didnt not render at all after some playing. Fixing it, I got it to mimic what Netscape 4.7x does. The middle right frame does not display it's proper color, or for that matter, anything. If anything is placed inside it, except a space, it renders properly. Otherwise, good luck. The line of code for it is, under the block of 20 img tags, the one that reads <TD VALIGN="TOP" WIDTH="82" BGCOLOR="#000000"></TD>. Some quotes: 1)*NETSCAPE MEETING** ok, we are all open source, now let's divide up the components shall we!#!?! "I GET XML!!!" "I GET JAVASCRIPT!!!" "I GET FANCY FEATURE NOBODY USES!!!!!" "okies but who gets tables!$!?!" <crickets> "OH WELLS WE DONT NEEDS TABLES WE USES LYNX INSTEAD!#!" 2) oh i see we have smarty man who thinks "oh well, if it doesn't have stuff in it it's not worth rendering, alalalal"

Sending to `Help' component. I think the reporter needs it...

Oh. I didn't see the URL. Reassigning to....Frames?

Ross Lombardi, mozilla does not support the <layer> tag. Please take a look at http://sites.netscape.net/ekrock/standards.html for more information. Over to evangelism.

-> evangelism@telocity.com for my evangelism bugs. removing the now-depreciated evangelism-related keywords. setting platform to All.

Reassigning evangelism bugs to bclary@netscape.com.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84101 ***

All Evangelism Bugs are now in the Product Tech Evangelism. See bug 86997 for details.

is this a dup? Doesn't look like one to me

No, it is not a dupe. Sorry about that. But the reporter is the site owner eh? The examples on the url are still layer based. What do we do about him? Will reopen though

I had just checked this in Netscape 6.2 and it there is no difference whatsoever in the two examples. Unless there's something else I'm not seeing, it would appear this is nothing to worry about?

yep, it looks like the wrbm compatibility stuff help you out so long as you stay in quirks mode (no doctype). the layer issues with geocities ad cruft. we have another bug on them for that. so, Ross, ok to mark this one as fixed?

It looks good. Yep.

done

Verified 2002030208/WinXP